 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Welcome to Solicism! Selman Kum The book (Google) I know something that humanity doesn't know. It was always there, you just have to recognize it. It was always there, you just never recognized it. What do people talk about 24 hours a day, all the time? Shall I say? For example: right and wrong. You have to do it this way and that way, do it this way or listen to me and don't listen to the others. And that's how we talk about right and wrong. Because you can't think away what is right. That's the paradigm. Paradigm is: example: If I bring someone from the past into the future and say this is a car, then he thinks what, what is this an animal, a plant, he can't do anything with the word. I don't know what it is. Only when it drives and you tell him it's wheels and that's how a car can move. That's how he knows what a car looks like, that's how a paradigm is created. He can no longer think it away. You can't understand and recognize what you don't know. I know another paradigm that humanity doesn't know. Why do people go to war? Out of love of country, love of ideology and love of God. Love for the deceased brother, that's how hatred arises. Because love does not want to be disappointed, for example: When I shake you, what do I feel? Hate! Or someone kills your brother, what do you feel then? Hate! Because love wants to hear. If your girlfriend cheats on you, you produce hate, because love wants to be obeyed. Serve, because love does not want to be disappointed. Machines: Machines have to work for all of us. Machines don't work overtime, they don't want a wage, they are the best workers, they don't take breaks. They work 24 hours a day. But they have to work for everyone, not just for the minority. Minority because we respect property and they make their money from the masses. Look at Greece, for example, what happened to the people. They always got Coke, Marlboro, Coke, Marlboro, but earned nothing in return. So the stores are always full, but nobody has any more money because it goes to America, and all the camels flowed to the Illuminati in America. What does an Illuminati say: What I don't know won't hurt me. Don't wake the sleeping. They know we are slaves because we have to start over every month. The money goes up because the eye watches the world, that the workers keep working, only the minority doesn't because the minority exploits us. By saying, "Respect property". They make their money through the masses. The working people thus develop into a rag-tag bunch through the statute "respect property". I'll tell you how the Illuminati think. How the masses should think, a hopeful thought. E.G.: Harry was working, Willi was working, Hans was working, but Günter did it. Thoughts of hope. I propose a strategic plan for the working people. 7 years break, 3 years work, only 5 hours a day. Everyone gets 6000 euros every month. For a man and a woman, that's 12 thousand euros a month. Then there is no ??? fear. FOR EXAMPLE: I buy a Porsche with my wife in 4 months. The Porsche will no longer cost 250,000 euros, it will only cost 40,000 euros because we won't have to pay any capital gains tax, just the production costs of 40,000 euros. It will last 100 years. The brand was just an example, it applies to all products. This means that people are the slaves and no longer the workers. The machines are then the lowest hierarchy. Another topic: If I give you money and say kill this one and that one. Who goes to hell then? You and I, we can never think it away, even if you kill 10, or one bad one. You can't think it away. God only likes weak people, you should not kill. If you kill, you are strong. That's how the superhuman is created, by not listening. People talk about right and wrong. And why, because they are looking for solutions. The advantage of laziness: laziness doesn't mean sitting around, it means developing your ego. I go painting, I go play soccer, I go to the mosque with my son. That's how you develop your ego. If you're good, you're a good citizen, a good worker, the boss always wants a good worker. If the worker says, I'm taking a break, then he's promoting his ego. The city favors a minority that they can exploit a mass, in law, city, property. The worker must keep what he has earned for himself, as his own reputation. But the worker needs experience, or someone teaches him. And that is He: Selman Kum The sleeper must awaken, Morpheus The dictator Anyone can become a dictator, become greedy for power. That's why we don't have to have a dictator, but all citizens must carry weapons. First they take away your weapons, then your freedom of speech, and then they force you to work again and be a slave. The word of the Lord is good. The city wants the citizen to be good and to serve. Good worker, good servant, so you must serve again. That's why everyone must bear arms again, so that no dictator comes to power. FOR EXAMPLE: If I tell a gambling addict not to gamble, he can't help it, he has to gamble. That's how a dictator thinks, he comes into a dictatorship world. All dictators have the same pattern. It's the same: I have a store, someone else does too. But the other person thinks, why is his store doing better than mine? It's always the same pattern of behavior. Pancho Villa killed someone when he was 17. A soldier who had raped his sister! He fled to the mountains and became a bandit. They attacked trains, banks and stole herds of cattle. He joined the poor because he also came from a poor background. He fought against two dictators. The first was Diaz. 2 years later Huerta. Diaz stole the gold safe from Mexico and led a carefree life in France, in Paris. 2 years later, Huerta also stole a gold safe and fled to Australia, where he also led a carefree life. In the Mexican Civil War 4 million people died, from 1912 to 1918. Then Pancho wanted to start a third civil war, but the Illuminati killed him. Why else would the workers have learned, through experience, that they were no longer slaves. If they had learned, the Illuminati system would have collapsed because they learn by experience that they are no longer slaves. Because that way the Illuminati can put their money wherever they want, then their system is zero and void Joker from Batman Selman Kum The rat Morpheus, the sleeper must awake. There is nothing more beautiful than waste (consumption!) Those who practice power are hated. Be realistic, try the impossible. Permanent happiness can only be achieved through egoism in associations. Only the unimaginative escape into reality. What does Sherlock Holmes say to Dr. Watson, they see but do not recognize. I am founding a party: IFP = International Laziness Party My book, my concept I can prove with math that the Illuminati exist. E.G.: A German goes on vacation to Ireland, goes to a hotel, and asks the hotel owner if a room is available. The Irish hotel owner says: Yes, I have. The German says: Can I have a look? The Irishman says: You have to give a deposit of 100 euros. The German agrees and gives him the 100 euros. The German goes into the room, the hotel owner runs to the butcher and gives him the 100 euro deposit. The butcher runs to the prostitute and pays the 100 euros he owes. The prostitute goes to the hotel owner, gives him the 100 euros she owes. The hotel owner returns the 100 euro deposit to the German. And everyone has paid the debt. Out of LOVE! If you hated it, you wouldn't go to war. The reasons are simple. Love of country, love of ideology, love of God, love of brother to God, love for a brother who has died, etc. Question: Why is "good" weak and "evil" strong? Society is based on slavery. Society exploits its citizens so that the rich can become even richer. He who has violence has "right"! The citizen who has no violence also has no right - violence is always above the law. You don't get far with a sack full of "law", but you do with a sack full of "violence", because violence makes law. The Mongols were a warrior caste that terrified the whole of Europe and Asia. They were a plague for the Christians and for the Chinese. The Mongols were brutal in their execution. To make them look more dangerous, they inflicted scars on themselves, mostly on their faces. The Mongols had no overlords to obey. They were bursting with courage. When they needed advice, they asked their spirits. The Mongolian philosophy is well illustrated by an example from the animal kingdom. Leafy plants feed on leaves, which in turn are home to beetles that feed on leafy plants. To prevent the aphids from being eaten by the beetles, the aphids give the ants their milk. In return, the ants have to protect the aphids from the beetles. Why do you think the Chinese built such a large and long wall? The Mongols were businessmen. They realized that prices had to be the same everywhere. Fixed wages! In this case, the normal citizens are the leaf-peepers, because they had no means of defending themselves against the buyers. The citizens just want to live well and be content. They are not interested in who is in power. Because the first law of nature is satisfaction. People want to live well, eat well, love well, etc. There is no purpose for these people. Only satisfaction counts. However, if you are not satisfied, hatred and dissatisfaction arise because the state, society, etc. etc. do not love you.TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW Thinking is just an idea. When you think, you only follow ideas. In order to realize your thinking, the people who are to realize this idea must serve, must obey. This is how God came into being. Because people should obey God, serve God, a spirit, an idea. God came into being through love. Being human is also an idea. If you are not human, you are not human because you do not serve. The "true" human being is only the inhuman (the ¨bermensch). Not "Jesus" is the "superman" and not God either, but only the "inhuman" (the "superman"). The egoist only ever seeks his own self-interest, his own satisfaction. There is no spiritual reward for the person who believes in God, there is only satisfaction, because satisfaction is the satisfaction of the individual who believes in nothing but his own satisfaction. TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW Humans are undergoing a metamorphosis = transformation. We are not yet finished butterflies. We sleep in the chrysalis, the metamorphosis has yet to be completed. Man follows an idea because he has not yet come to himself and allows himself to be enslaved by ghosts and ideas. If he does not follow these ideas, he is threatened by his own consciousness, e.g. "This is wrong!" or "This is right!". People live in this world of thought and do not ask themselves why this or that is the case. They follow the idea of "good" or "wrong", "right" or "wrong". For the egoist, the right "true" spirit, there is no "good" or "evil", "right" or "wrong". Nothing comes over him, he himself is the "good" or "bad", the "right" or "wrong" in a person. He does not submit to any rules, because he himself sets the rules of the game. For him, there are only opponents. Because even the so-called 'good guys' are obsessed, as they kill, humiliate, subjugate, punish, admonish and subjugate people for their ideas. Principles such as morality, ethics and reason are also part of this bondage & humiliation of the mind. The egoist recognizes no other right but his own, he never denies his own self, never acts against his nature, never follows the herd instinct or an idea that is not of use to him. If there is no profit in it, he cannot satisfy his feelings, his instincts. The egoist has undergone the metamorphosis, has developed from it over the course of his years and is free, i.e. not obsessed by an idea that comes from outside. Where morality begins, humility begins. Humility means breaking the courage to recognize it, the cheap life. Morals and ethics are also ideas; they only work if you obey, if you carry out instructions like a robot. The other person who is looking for me is always looking for the mind, i.e. the third person (this is reason, morality, ethics, "good", "evil"). The normal citizen must submit to these things so that he is "good", so that he does not give offense.
TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW It is said that you are possessed by the devil. But possessed is also the "good" who believes in good, because good means "obeying", "being loyal" etc. One can also be possessed by "moral influences". The moral influence begins where the humiliation begins. It is nothing other than the breaking and bending of courage, of your own will, that brings you down to humility. God wants you to honor your parents, respect the crucifix, speak the truth, etc., because this belongs to man, man's profession, so this is the "moral influence". If you are not obedient, loyal, you will be admonished, i.e. you will be threatened, because you are not walking the "straight = right path". Those who admonish you are the priests, judges, authorities, etc. I call them philistines (= good talkers), those who want to convince you of the good, want to weaken you, want to weaken your consciousness, your spirit, by making you "serve" for a "fixed" idea to which you are supposed to subject your spirit, e.g. being human, being a communist, being good, etc. They want to instill a conscience in you. They want to instill a conscience in you, i.e. suppress your courage to recognize. You should accept everything that is good in their eyes as a given and not worry about it, you should simply accept it even though it does not correspond to your convictions. They do not want you to develop or show courage or initiative, this is the so-called bending of courage. You should be obedient, become obedient, give up your will against a foreign one that is set up as a rule and law, thus you should humble yourself before a higher one, for example, "He who humiliates himself will be exalted! A good person, according to the judgment of the supposedly "good", is the one who has been taught and inculcated, drilled, blown into and preached good principles. If one resists this influence, the good ones despair and cry out: But for heaven's sake, if you don't give the children good teaching, they will run straight into the devil's hands and become useless. Slowly, slowly, you foolish prophets of doom, they will certainly become good-for-nothing according to your sense, but your sense is a rather good-for-nothing one. They will no longer allow you to influence them and will no longer have any sympathy for the sentimentality you live and preach. If you command, "Bow down to the Most High," they will answer, "If he will bow down to us, let him come and do it himself. We will not bow down of our own free will." If you threaten to punish us, we will take it like a dog barking. Dogs that bark do not bark. If you are unsuccessful in your attempt to frighten us, the rule has lost its foundation, the nursemaids will no longer find FAITH.TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW The difference between artificial and stimulated feelings is that the stimulated ones are of an egoistic nature because they are not predetermined or imposed. The artificial ones are usually possessed, e.g. the "judge", the "policeman", the "civil servant" etc. Liberals talk about freedom, but how free can we be? They are afraid of granting complete freedom to the individual person, because the individual person will be the unhuman. That is why the obsessed liberals restrict freedom to the effect that the individual must act morally and ethically, otherwise there would be no moral, ethical and reasonable order. The individual person must serve morality, reason, a "fixed" idea, otherwise anarchy, lawlessness and arbitrariness arise. But if reason prevails, the PERSON prevails. Liberals are zealots of reason, it is their mistress, because they cannot tolerate naughtiness, self-development and self-determination must be subordinated to the common good. It is patronized. TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW You good obsessed person. You think you're serving a good cause. How many people have you killed, executed in Texas? You read the Bible every day, forty minutes, I read that in an interview, but I think you read the wrong pages every day. You think you've always been a good person, you've always had money, you've never been down. Your father is a millionaire, you were born his rich son. You never had any problems, like most people in your country who were not destined to be born rich. If you were poor, you would be more worried. You should think about this, because there are so many poor people in your country who only aspire to be rich. You are promoting death by sending dollars to Colombia to create a civil war; always remember, you pious Bible reader, the Bible says: "He who sows violence will also reap violence." It is not the drugs that are to blame for the misery, but the dollars. If you don't have dollars, you look for a way to get them, even if it is through the drug trade. If you have a responsibility to your family, if you have to put up with crying children every day because they don't have enough to eat, you're not interested in how you can help your family get more food. Bush, you haven't been down yet, you've never been poor. Only when you're down do you realize the truth. There are too many sycophants, yes-men and hypocrites around you who will never tell you the truth, only what you want to hear. There is a philosophy: if it doesn’t tickle your stomach, life is boring! You have never transported cocaine, you have never taken drugs. So you don't know people's problems. You spray pesticides on fields, even though you know that there are drinking water wells there that are poisoned as a result; so the Indians have no way of cultivating their fields, feeding their families, etc. Your life is boring, you are obsessed with the delusion of being good, of being in control and if not on the ground, then with your rockets, you madman. There is a social solution to every social problem. It's a rocky road, but it's more worthwhile than your entire policy. You think of only one thing: profit, gain, wealth, whatever the cost! You are not interested in the people and nature.TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW Which critic does not establish dogmas (=doctrines of faith, = ideas that must be followed) and wants nothing more than to get to know things. The critic is afraid of becoming dogmatic. Criticism is something "naughty" against another person. It has nothing to do with love, kindness, cordiality, etc. So when I criticize another person, it's something I don't like or don't want to leave as it is, because I'm feeling guilty about it myself. For this reason, I criticize and destroy the idea of the obsessed who believe in the state and society, who believe in their enslaved ideas, because criticism destroys these ideas. Criticism removes the basis for the glorification of these ideas. The critic wants to experience self-gratification through his approach, because he does not follow any ideas. His criticism is based on the principle of success; if he criticizes successfully, this is a satisfaction for his consciousness, for his spirit. He recognizes himself and satisfies himself. Through his criticism, he exposes the obsessed. The best state will obviously be the one that has the most loyal citizens (slaves, servants), which is why it sees in every citizen the potential evil that must be constricted by laws, ordinances and regulations. For this reason, the state must ensure that its citizens pay homage to the law, the state, the authorities and serve these "powers". Through immorality, the state can dissolve into anarchy because it can no longer assert itself. The law is sacred in the sense of the state and anyone who violates it is a criminal. The state is the hierarchy of the law and therefore the egoist can only satisfy himself in crime in all cases in which his benefit runs counter to the will of the state. The state takes the view that its laws and orders are "sacred" everyone should bow to them "and "obey", "be good", "be decent" etc. The state does not tolerate self-determination, e.g. the self-determination of two people to fight a duel. It imposes a penalty on dueling, the dueling law. The state wants no one to serve a master outside of it. Its power is called law, a spirit that all should fear. We egoists, however, are not afraid, because these laws do not exist for us. They are air. We can breathe them in and out. We do our own thing, i.e. we make the rules (= here laws) for ourselves. Those who deny their own ego are pleasant to the state, because it becomes very easy for the state to control these creatures so that they serve, obey and do not generate their own will. Conscience arises through threats. In childhood, we are threatened by our parents if we are not "well-behaved", do not "obey". The rod either overcomes the person or the person overcomes the rod, which means that you can no longer scare a child with the rod as soon as it knows that its own defiance and courage no longer have to fear the rod, as it has outgrown it. The prerequisite is that this process has been completed by the child, e.g. by going to the bottom of things in the course of its own liberation, by looking behind things. A child has a natural "nose", because it is naturally curious and fearless, wants to learn more, which is why it likes to explore hidden corners, look for what has been hidden and taken away and try its hand at everything. But there is one thing to bear in mind: Behind the rod, more powerful than it, is our defiance, our defiant courage. Very slowly we come to understand what seems scary or what we are not comfortable with, such as the power of the rod or the stern face of the father. Behind all of this, however, we find our intrepidity, power, fearlessness, counter-violence and invincibility. What previously inspired respect and fear in us, we are no longer afraid of, we no longer turn tail but take courage. Behind all this, behind the orders of parents or a superior, is our cunning cleverness, our courageous will and our defiance. The more we hold on to these things, the smaller the high wall (e.g. the orders of parents or superiors) that previously seemed almost insurmountable to us appears. And what is cleverness, courage, cunning, defiance? What else but – SPIRIT!!! Childhood rushes on, now the youngster stands there. He tries to follow spiritual ideas. He always wants to look behind the scenes and recognize. He explores the mind more and more often and the object less and less. In the course of his childhood, the youth has learned to no longer overcome the resistance of the laws of the world, so he is now exposed to the objections of the spirit, of reason, of his own conscience. This is unreasonable, unchristian, unpatriotic, etc." the voice of conscience now cries out loudly and frightens us off. We do not fear the power of the reigning God, insofar as he also sees what is hidden, not the punitive rod of the father, the evil eye of the neighbor, the stubborn order of the general, but - the CONSCIENCE. What is actually my property? Nothing but what is under my control. What property am I entitled to? To any property to which I personally authorize myself or which I take by force (force decides on property!). I give myself the right of ownership, for example, by taking property or by having the power of ownership, the power of attorney, the authorization given to me. Everything that is not taken from me by force remains in my possession. Thus, violence decides on property and I want to expect everything from my violence. Violence that I leave to another makes me a slave, a serf. My own power, however, makes me the owner. Do I withdraw my power when I give power to others through my own strength (violence) out of ignorance (e.g. if I am not aware of this)? I live in another dimension = in the consciousness of the other. False consciousness is always connected with respect for property. Do I take everything that my power is sufficient for, do I take everything that I may achieve through my power and let this turn into personal property? Egoism or self-interest provides the clarity about this; not the principle of love and not the motives of love, such as meekness, self-righteousness, goodness or fairness. Love only knows sacrifice and "self-sacrifice" (to be equated with enslavement and humiliation of one's own consciousness). God does not like people who have a will of their own, because their own will expresses the individual, their own personality. Rather, he likes people who are his subjects, e.g. all those who obey his established laws. However, those who obey these laws have no will or only a prescribed will. Something else: The card player who gambles away his money is rewarded by his brain every time he wins, because of the previous feeling of anxiety when he thinks he has a better hand of cards than the other player and risks his money. This eternal back and forth as to whether one is better or worse puts the player into a state of anxiety, which he loves and which makes him dependent, as the feeling of winning the whole stake in the end overrides the fear. This can be explained by the hunting instinct from our prehistoric times, e.g. the instinct to be afraid of the violence of a powerful animal when hunting for bucks. You enter into this danger out of dependence and you only take this risk because you are rewarded with the animal at the end of a successful hunt. The brain releases feelings of happiness that are stronger than the fear that you previously had of an animal. The same applies to the revolutionaries, who also love fear, as they are rewarded later if they are successful. TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW Revolutions are always made by the people. They are always dictated from below and wars, by contrast, are always dictated from above. No people ask the government to start a war. What actually is revolution? Revolution is nothing other than revenge against a minority; the rich who own everything and have established themselves and therefore refer to the commandment "respect the property of others". The masses, who have nothing, who have been turned into lumpenpack (lumpenpack) by the above commandment, crave revenge because they live on a subsistence level and feel envy when they look at the rich and their property. You can't blame these people, the wealth of others has turned them into evil individuals, not themselves. They have ceased to be good. A revolution can only take place when an empowerment has taken place. For example, discontent against the master, the idea or the system – the power apparatus of the rich. Jesus, Karl Marx and Martin Luther were empowerers, but they did not recognize the truth. Only Selman Kum "the Last", better known as "the Rat" has unmasked the truth of love. However, the empathy must reach a strong level. It must be greater than the fear of the existing laws, which may also entail death. You have to get downright intoxicated, because if you succeed, the brain rewards you for this rush of fear by releasing a happiness hormone. I refer you to the explanations in the above chapter "Vagabonds".TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW The "good" person is created through obedience, which means that the "idea" that is above him in his mind, such as fatherland, God, patriotism, the laws, good and bad, order, being human, morality, reason, etc., decide on his person and how he should behave so that he is accepted in the social order and can therefore be better controlled. The individual must decide how he should behave so that he is accepted in the social order and can therefore be better controlled. However, the superman disregards these things by disobeying and imposing his own will, turning himself into an anarchist or egoist for the realization of his own being. The state wants all its citizens to become pacifists. They should not defend themselves, they should serve the "idea", allow themselves to be exploited by the "ideas". The human being satisfies his own will, his own desires, which he wants to achieve. The time of antiquity (Socrates) was the time of the spirit. People wanted to recognize the truth. They recognized that the true spirit could be a weapon. The Greeks lived in a social order in which the mind had not yet been dominated by the "idea". Their aim was to gain so much from life that the spirit was satisfied, e.g. through good food, good wine, sociable friends, dialectical skill, eloquence, the art of disputation, simply put, through a pleasurable life. In the beginning, they were all superhuman and uncontrollable for society, as they all saw only their own benefit in the foreground. It was only Socrates, the thinker, who explained that you have to do good, follow your heart, i.e. do good, but doing good also means serving and being submissive and that the highest hierarchy can control us. The idea needs a hierarchy in order to function, i.e. the social order. This was the downfall of the Greeks, because they became servants, better because they believed in the "idea". The truth became an untruth. In this way, people are manipulated and trained to become "good" public servants through their upbringing. We are not talking here about civil servants, who are also generally regarded as "public servants". We are talking here about the generality of servants, the people who are supposed to be enthusiastic about and sacrifice themselves for the "idea". The state thus demands that individuals give up their own will in order to inculcate or instill the will of the state. Those who sacrifice themselves and are enthusiastic are agitating against those who have a will of their own. Those who stand up for their own interests are branded as criminals, as they represent competition that cannot be tolerated by the state, as it jeopardizes its existence as such. So it threatens the superhuman with violence, including death. Another point I would like to mention here: Greek democracy only lasted as long as it did because they had slaves. Today, it is the workers who, like robots or ants, bear the brunt of the hierarchy on their shoulders. One of the superhumans I would like to talk about here is the Asian Mongol and tribal leader Genghis Khan. He joined forces with friendly tribes and became his father's successor at the age of 13. His empire stretched from the Persian Gulf almost as far as the Arctic Ocean. Countries such as China, Iran, Iraq, India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Russia and parts of Turkey, to name but a few, were under his rule. With his warriors, he conquered many regions in a very short time. His reputation preceded him. He organized the overmen; anyone who stood in their way was overrun. His principle was as simple as it was cruel: "Either for me or against me". Not only Mongols rode under his banner, but also Indians and Chinese, or rather all those who joined him. His role models were parasites, fleas that sucked the host's blood but did not kill him. He never immediately waged a war of aggression or surprise, but sent a delegation in advance to negotiate. If this delegation returned without a corresponding positive signal, the agreement to serve him, Genghis Khan, as subjects and to trade accordingly and tolerate the religion, the tribal chief had to use force to enforce his plans. One of his mottos was: Mass makes violence and violence makes law. Due to the might of the hordes of horsemen, many other city and tribal rulers as well as other countries reluctantly gave in and submitted to him as subjects. In some countries, he was even celebrated as a liberator, as it overthrew the top rulers in the hierarchy who had become rich at the expense of the general public. The masses were starving and had a dreary and simple life. The Mongols were very keen to show loyalty to their leader. They knew how to deal with violence and not just use it blindly. They understood the art of intimidation. Even the Franciscan monk Johann von Carpin noted in his travelogues that the Mongols are the most obedient subjects in the world. They are even more obedient than his friars to their superiors. They showed their masters more reverence than any other people and did not dare to attack them. Rarely or never did they exchange bad words with each other, never did quarrels degenerate into brawls, not even when they were drunk and this happened very often. War, quarrels, bodily harm and manslaughter never occurred among them. People who committed robberies and theft on a grand scale were not found among them. They therefore had neither locks nor bolts on their chests to protect their possessions in this way. This was not necessary. If livestock was lost, the finder left it to its fate or took it to the people who were expressly employed to look after it. One paid due respect to the other; they saw each other almost as members of a family. Genghis Khan died in 1227 at the age of 65 in a riding accident. Had he not suffered this fate, it would have been quite conceivable that he would have conquered Europe with his horde of horsemen. One of his philosophies was this: "You can break an arrow with luck, but not ten arrows at the same time!" After his death, his son and grandson divided the country between them. Batu Khan (son) received the west of the Mongol Empire, Kubilai Kahn (grandson) the east. Both adopted different religions, Batu became a Mohammedan and Kubilai devoted himself to Buddhism. They hoped that this would allow them to remain the masters and that the overhumans would accept this. The superhuman spirit was pacifized by these religions; the clans were not to rebel against the masters. Thus they had sovereign power against the clans. Thus the Mongol spirit became the Mohammedan and Buddhist spirit. This was the downfall of the Mongols, or rather of the overman. The superhuman spirit, the free spirit, was destroyed by the dogma because the Mongol spirit had subdued itself. The friend of truth is the word "Why?" The child asks his father: "Why is the sun round or why is it raining?" The father answers these questions truthfully. The child recognizes these facts and the child's mind stops fantasizing about them and finds itself in logic. If it has no logic, it continues to fantasize because it does not recognize the truth. Further questions could be: "Why do we steal, why are we greedy, why do we hate, why do we lie, why do we have crooked thoughts, why do we usually only cry when it comes to people from our immediate circle of acquaintances?" Everything is related to our underdeveloped, Stone Age mind. This is not suitable for the current civilization, as we have only been living with this spirit for a short time. We can trace all the above questions back to a single thing, namely our spiritual instincts, e.g. the survival instinct, which drives us to hunt or gather. If this was not possible under certain circumstances, we would steal to satisfy this instinct. As the "only one", the focus was on me. There was no sense of injustice, because my well-being was more important than that of others, because the individual must calm his conscience with regard to the instinct to survive. The conscience was then soothed when one stole from one's neighbor, but in the end the family mules could be stuffed again. You often recognize these things when you confront alleged statements with the word "why". "Why do people go to war? Why do they do it? For what reason did the prophets not recognize this problem? They did not doubt love and for this reason it did not occur to them to question love, namely with the word 'why'. They only researched love, looked for rules and explanations in order to be able to justify lawfulness. Through targeted disinformation and smear campaigns, ordinary warriors were presented with a false image with which they were supposed to identify patriotically. He "loved" and then became enthusiastic about this "idea" and would even die for it. Each of these foreign ideas, to which one submits and for which one is supposed to be enthusiastic, brings us closer to the lumpen pack. The human "primal or human instincts" are chased and suppressed and in their place comes the "idea". The "idea" is a thing that awakens a sense of community. The "idea" has nothing to do with solipsism (from the Latin solus: alone and ipse: self). Each of these "ideas" always carries with it a valuation, e.g. good person, good communist, good citizen, good Buddhist, good Christian etc. etc. This "good" is responsible for the lumping process. Basically, everyone always wants to be "good", very few can live with "not being good" or just the opposite, not being a good person etc. Many people can't cope with the verbal arguments if they don't want to understand or act out certain things, for example: "You want to be a good person, don't you?" Most people want this and therefore jump over their shadows and no longer follow their ideas or urges and allow themselves to be lulled into complacency by these words. In their opinion, the "idea" is the better part of the human being. "Your spirit is not my spirit, but your spirit is not your spirit either! " Your spirit is the true spirit that you can always follow. However, you are currently only following the spirit of ideas, not your spirit. Your spirit submits to the "idea", e.g. communism, fatherland, democracy, being human, being good, etc. An example would be that God is an "idea" and this "idea" knows no boundaries. One imagines the most horrible things or the most beautiful heaven. When you research God in truth, you realize that truth is untruth and untruth is truth. Christianity has researched the Godhead for 1500 years and has made the spirit look so cruel that one is afraid of its natural nakedness. The spirit should not have any feelings. You should not follow your urges, you should always satisfy your spirit and always do good, submit to the hierarchy. Christianity has benefited from the fact that the lowest strata of the hierarchy could not learn to read or write; they should not recognize the power of the word. The citizens should have a Christian spirit. If the spirit is Christian, the heart is also Christian. In their obsession and in their delusions they have committed the most terrible atrocities. Often under the guise of having done everything in the name of God. They were not supposed to grumble or rebel against their master and any criticism was more or less forbidden. For example, we know that Copernicus, who recognized that the earth was not the center but the sun, was persecuted. He was accused of heresy and sorcery. In order to prove his "innocence", he tried to prove the opposite to the Inquisition using his telescope, with which he carried out his research and calculations. However, he was not believed and the telescope was dismissed as a devil's tool that would have deceived the mind and senses. He had to renounce his research and his theories and confirm this with his signature on a piece of paper. He was then grounded for life. Attila, the king of the Huns, the god of God, the king of the Mongols, sits in his tent and receives a visit from a theologian sent from Rome. After a friendly greeting from Attila, he was asked who he had brought with him. Apart from the theologian and Attila, no one was present in the tent. Astonished, the theologian asked, as he saw no one other than Attila and himself, what he meant by this. Attila then said that there was a spirit present that was not his. For the spirit does not bring to light any reflection of its own, or does not reflect the person, but only reflects the idea, e.g. being human, being good, being reasonable, being moral, etc. This idea hovered in the air. This idea hovered over him and had power over him. Furthermore, Attila did not want to be enslaved by this idea = spirit, as it was not his property. The theologian wanted to show Attila that the spirit was the better part of man. Attila did not listen because he was a superman, a cognizer, a philanthropist. It would be better if he were an opponent, because people should respect each other as opponents. This is one reason why Mongols and Christians did not understand each other at that time. The Mongol did not value the spirit. Since the ancients worked towards overcoming the world and strove to free man from the heavy, entangling bonds of connection with others, they ultimately came to the dissolution of the state and the preference for everything private. The community, the family, etc., are, as natural conditions, annoying restraints which impede spiritual freedom. TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW ... is a crime against humanity. I will illustrate this with an example: Four people come to a café owner with the request to be given a table at which they can play games of chance, e.g. poker. Each of the four people has a certain amount of cash, e.g. 2,500 US dollars, which is wagered. This money flows back and forth. Sometimes one person wins 1,000 US $, sometimes the other. Sometimes one loses US$ 3,000, sometimes the other US$ 1,500. These people don't just play for half an hour, but sometimes for two days without interruption. They are addicted to the game; or rather, they are obsessed. They cannot stop until they have satisfied themselves with the drug, they follow the urge to hunt and try to make prey. Sometimes they succeed, sometimes they do not. However, the café owner receives 80 US dollars per hour for providing a table. If the game is 10 hours long, the owner receives 800 US dollars without having taken any risk. The game usually continues until each player has no more money to pay the table rent and the game comes to an end. The café owner has the monopoly and this is also the reality of society. Large companies buy products from small companies and can determine the prices due to the large number of products. The small companies can no longer compete and follow their own pricing policy. The monopolist makes its money by selling its goods en masse. This means that the small companies are dependent on this monopolist, as they sometimes only produce for this one customer (monopolist). However, if the monopolist cannot buy the goods on its terms because the small company demands more money, it can use its monopoly position to drive the small company to ruin, as it only has this one customer and only produces for this customer. If this business relationship is interrupted or terminated by the monopolist, then the small company faces ruin, as it has no other customers to supply. Example: The small farmer produces 1,000 tomatoes. He can sell these at a price and thus cover his costs. The large landowner produces 20,000 tomatoes in the same time and can offer them at a lower price than the small farmer. People buy the goods that are cheaper and so the small farmer will soon no longer be able to cover his costs and will have to sell his property. To whom? Of course, the large landowner will buy this piece of land and thus become even more influential. Since the farmer cannot live on air and love and feed his family, he looks for work. The large landowner can give him work, but on his terms, namely to till and cultivate the field that he previously sold to the large landowner. The small farmer is therefore dependent on the large landowner. He does the same work as before, but he is now dependent on the large landowner. He is therefore now controllable, as he can no longer make his own decisions now that he has sold his land. He has now lost his independence and is therefore more manageable and controllable in every respect. Another example (global view): The USA is the strongest economic power and it is constantly trying to expand its position of power to infinity, almost comparable to the Roman Empire of antiquity. They want to conquer the world through their economy and constantly make it dependent on their products. However, countries that are independent of the American imperialist federation cannot be controlled by the Americans. However, countries that mainly trade with the Americans, such as Mexico, Turkey, Colombia, etc., are puppets of the USA in an emergency, as the Americans can immediately stop their trade relations and in a certain way cripple the economy of these countries, resulting in unemployment, poverty and inflation, the so-called lump effect. TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW The free spirit (the vagabond / the restless mind) The good citizen is committed to morality, works diligently, is ambitious, serves the "good" cause. He cares little about what happens around him, develops little interest in problems that are not his own, e.g. the poverty in his street, in the alleys of his neighborhood. He satisfies his poor conscience by giving a few handouts to people in need who live on the street. He has a job and is not interested in who makes the policy; who is in power, the main thing is that his property is protected. The good citizen despises those who do not lead a decent, solid life, such as prostitutes, criminals, day thieves, gamblers who gamble away house and home, proletarians, vagabonds, etc., who all belong to the restless classes. The dear, good citizen would like to know that he is protected by the state against the above-mentioned. He does not understand them and for this reason is afraid and contemptuous. He is unaware of the background to individual fates or cannot comprehend them from his point of view. For this reason, he has no connection and adopts a correspondingly negative attitude. However, a vagabond only follows his own needs, usually he does not follow any rules, except the ones he has set up and determined for himself. If the tramp is tired and doesn't want to go on, then he doesn't go on, because he follows his free spirit, he is independent and doesn't have to serve anyone, such as the family, the boss, the fatherland, the nation. On the contrary, the good citizen is dependent on these things, because in times past he has already enslaved his spirit through these things, he has become dependent; he follows false ideals, therefore he lacks faith in himself, he has become a slave to love. These are reasons that make it impossible to understand vagabonds and restless children. He follows his ideal images and therefore despises vagabonds and restless children because they do not follow his own ideal image. The citizen who follows the ideal images is a good citizen, because the more he follows, the more loyal he becomes. The state is based on the slavery of labor. If labor becomes free, the state is lost!!! TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW Enslavement of the spirit (the dependent spirits) Example: 6 workers watch their boss collecting money. He collects, collects and collects. The question that now arises is who is to blame for the fact that only this one boss collects and the workers only receive a certain low wage so that he can exist and consume. However, he can only consume for this one month so that he has to go back to work. The only one to blame for the boss raking in so much is the proletariat itself, as it is admonished and threatened by the state to respect property. If they were to lose respect, everyone would have property so that they could say they had been paid according to value. The capitalist is always favored by the state because the state encourages the proletariat's sense of dependence. In the sense that he must have a family, take care of his work every day, not strive for laziness or not even be able to afford it through his work, because he has to work every month for himself and his family so that he can live another month longer. The proletarians do not have a large surplus that they could put to one side, only the capitalist does, and this explains why he has already financed his right to laziness, freedom, salvation and independence after a very short time. If the worker demands a higher wage or does not respect the boss's property or does not share in the profits, he is branded a "criminal". If he or the proletariat is independent, the state is lost, because the enemy of the state is independence, since the state is an idea and it only works if people obey it and do not question it. Its laws are its power, the earthly God has thus become worldly. The more dependent the worker is, the larger the state and state apparatus become. The state exerts its power through the law; if you disobey, you will be punished. It is not I who live, but the state that lives through me in my body and thus I do not reflect my own personality, but a small part of the state that demands my devotion and humility. The state is a hierarchical system that controls the masses. Those who reflect on these ideas and question the compulsion to conform to the ideal image will automatically turn into rags and thus the stultification effect occurs. Many believe that they have to pursue this ideal image because it is their destiny. Those who want to express themselves and step out of line are not welcome here and quickly join the ranks of those who are not welcome and desired in the state because they compete with the state on equal terms and are therefore labeled as opponents. Those who open the eyes of the proletarian and point out the local grievances, those who build on the allegiance of the state's supporters and enlighten them so that they also recognize and demand independence. The state only tolerates a small, privileged proportion of citizens who are allowed to be independent. These usually belong to the top of the hierarchy. In the worst case, the broad masses are merely allowed to dream about it and possibly indulge in the hope that this fixed idea could become reality through the state-organized and controlled lottery game. The lottery is merely an illusion of hope. People are supposed to believe that they can save themselves from work. The chance of winning the lottery is just as great as, for example, driving 1000 km to another country and finding a dollar by chance on the side of the road during a break. The chance of finding a dollar in the godforsaken loneliness on the side of the road is just as great as the chance of winning the big money in the lottery. In the search for salvation, the medium of television also suggests salvation. You can dream about it or you are told that if you are very, very diligent, you will become a very independent fellow human being and achieve honor, prosperity and wealth within a very short time. However, this is a fallacy or it takes a fair amount of luck to achieve this in the shortest possible time. Often in the search for this happiness, to become free through work, other traces remain that mark you personally, namely a destroyed existence, ruined family relationships, personal physical ailments or irreparable damage. As a result, the lifespan of these people is often very short or they have shortened their own lifespan enormously in their search. The capitalist has been extinguished because he belongs to or has created his own privileged class and has only created this demarcation through the exploitation of the working class, including through the favoritism of the state. The worker bears responsibility towards his family. The more responsibility he bears, the greater his dependence on the state, since the state is always concerned about the welfare of his family and is therefore no longer free. He is often unable to concentrate solely on his own self, as he is more preoccupied with other problems in his family, so his personal life and existence are neglected and often fall by the wayside. The more dependent he is, the more the state benefits. But often the proletariat or the lowest hierarchical class cannot be blamed because they do not have the consciousness to recognize it. Recognition of consciousness only occurs when the state's stultification process has previously produced a good breeding ground, e.g. when there is great poverty or unemployment. Only then can the seeds of revolution sprout. If people are happy and well off, there is little interest in dealing with such ideas. This is the case in the so-called northern countries, e.g. the United States of America, Canada, the majority of Europe (or rather the member states of the European Community). But actually this is not the case, as they are merely a consumer society, which in turn makes the rich richer, as they buy their products. Forbes magazine regularly identifies the richest men in the world. When you consider that 368 people on earth own 40% of the world's total wealth, this is clear evidence of the unbridled greed for power. But the citizens bear a great deal of guilt for having respected the property of others for so long. "Thou shalt not steal" is a statement that has fostered the misery of the world. To achieve its goal, I must either be a capitalist criminal or a "normal" criminal. Otherwise it is very, very difficult to acquire or obtain this solution. … or I have to deny my own self and become a scoundrel, which is what the state intends. I must respect its property. As I respect it, he becomes richer and richer. This in turn makes the rich man richer in the hierarchy. Goethe and Hegel are partly to blame for our misery in our present age, because they knew how to glorify the subject independently of the object; the perfectionists of reason and morality! They knew and glorified the fact that the state lives in us and not we live, because this idea makes us think. Egoism would then be a private matter that has nothing to do with the state, since the state itself is an egoist. It is also a despot. If we do not follow its words or obey its laws, we will be punished, intimidated, oppressed, etc. TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW What is the goal of the worker? TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW There seems to be a multitude of topics that people talk about. But the truth is that people only talk about two different topics day in, day out: Right and wrong. TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW You have opponents, but can they be any good? Anyone who has seen through this realizes that those who point the finger at others and shout the loudest are often the real enemies that need to be fought. TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW Now I'm going to tell you the truth about paradigm. I'll tell you a story through my professional mind. In 1970, Opek turned off the gasoline on Earth because of Palestine. There was no gasoline here on earth for 6 weeks. The Illuminati drew up a plan. In the region with the Opek they set a trap to scare the region. I'll give you an example: I'm a country like Iraq then the CIA comes and says, for example, I want to do good for my country and help but the people don't need it. They want someone like Saddam Hussein a tyrant. And why because they keep them dependent with d. Opek there was no embargo. Saddam H. is at their mercy. No one could control him they wanted to eliminate him. And as with war. The war is financed by money. It flowed to America through a banking crisis e.g. Germany lost 500 billion, France lost 500 billion etc. so they blamed everything on Saddam H. Topic: President Erdogan how he came to power 700 billion from the Illuminati. So he gave order to. Free to kill. Now he can't think it away. He greedily stole 100 billion, the Kurds prevented a paradigm. They didn't take me seriously. They believed Erdogan. If they listened to me, the world would be a better place. All the politicians knew about my book. I've been telling people about it since 2000 and my book has been out since 2007 (also on the Internet). The politicians knew how to prevent it, so everything happened like with Göring etc. War. They let them all run into the open knife. This system does not work. It is planned for the capitalist civilization, not for the enslaved worker civilization. I am in favor of dueling laws, e.g. I am a judge. If two people have decided to duel, I decide that I want to prevent it. I say to Günter and Hans you each get 6000 euros from the age of 18 until death. Free weed and cocaine. And if they no longer want to duel because one of them says no, the law doesn't work. If they both say yes to dueling, I can't stop it. Why, because the state has a monopoly on violence. It expresses its violence through laws. If you don't, you will be punished. Politicians etc. enforce their laws in the state through their own minds. They put their own minds in the police, politicians, courts and military in the places of power. That's how Trotsky did it in Russia, Hitler in Germany. I don't trust dictators and ballots. Because through dictatorship and elections their votes of the minded give him power. That's why everyone should arm themselves. Because if a dictator builds shit, they can defend themselves and shoot him down. He will never dare to cheat again. And when everyone gets 6,000 euros, they no longer have any existential fears and can shape their lives as they wish and enjoy freedom of expression for everyone. And everyone should become a capitalist. For all Ferrari etc. I know what the Illuminati are thinking, how they are deceiving everyone with wrong thinking. So that you don't find out about them, e.g. I'm a worker, Hans thinks that Harry is a worker, but Günter has made it. If you think like that, you've already lost. That's their system, that's how they want you to think. Because they don't want you to think anything else. So that you can't perceive this. What does a Mongol warrior say, I am more valuable than the biggest diamond. He never gives himself up for a price. That is why the workers have to wake up and see what they have earned as their own and organize themselves. The state is the only one that claims to organize for itself alone. That a minority exploits us. I wanted to say something else about Hitler, why he gassed the Jews so easily and thought he would never be persecuted. Why because he saw how the Armenians starved and died of thirst in the long march. 1/1/2 million died. And Hitler thought that nothing had happened to them, so I could do the same with the Jews and nothing would happen to me. He certainly thought of himself as a dictator so everyone should carry weapons, if he talks shit he will be shot. Better 100 deaths a day than 7 billion on this planet. Now about Hitler, the left-wing scene created a republic of retors from 1917 to 1948, there was a 1/2 year of anarchy in Germany, the workers organized themselves. This was a thorn in the side of the capitalists because the workers had organized themselves and then their money would have been null and void. So the capitalists called in the Freicops, the first Nazis in Germany, and they had the left-wing scene all killed. 20 thousand workers who fought back. And they think Rosa Luxemburg, Karl Liebknecht in Berlin and they think in Munich Gustav Landauer and Erich Mühsam were killed. The only one they didn't kill because he fled was Ziegelbremer from Dusseldorf. He fled to Mexico. He wrote books. A general comes from the jungle and he wrote Reflexion der Gelenkten. Those who wield power are hated because at that moment they are loved. One more thing about drugs in my system. Heroin and alcohol dull the senses. Cocaine and weed dull the senses. With cocaine and weed you have everything under control the senses are dulled Alcohol and cocaine is not good under control with cocaine you drink 3 bottles of vodka instead of 1 bottle of vodka and stand at attention like a 1 the next day. That's why alcohol has to be taken out of my system, as well as heroin, prostitution, interest, gambling, bio stuff, nuclear weapons and nuclear energy. And if everyone gets 6000 euros and everything is cheap, it will be even cheaper and even cheaper because we will only pay production costs, advertising 50% tax 21% VAT and 180% profit that the capitalist will add on will be gone. I am not Dr. Arroganto. Many people say that love and hate are close to each other, but they can't define it the way I do. For example: If I say to a woman that love leads to hate and she has no idea, she thinks the boy has problems or is cheeky. But if I explain it with examples, she can't think it away. And if I also say that love creates hate and say that the servant of love is hate, the virus has solidified and the paradigm can no longer be thought away and a paradigm shift takes place. Define cheeky for me as normal anger. Perhaps cheeky is brave, foolhardy or disrespectful and fearless towards the master, the boss, the state, etc. When I use examples to explain to her what causes hatred, she can no longer think it away. This creates a paradigm shift. And what else I know about love is: who is the servant of love? It is hate, because love knows no fun when it comes to love. It does not want to be disappointed, otherwise hatred will arise. A great philosopher of history had won the Nobel Prize in History. He could not understand why people go to war. Because love does not want to be disappointed and people do not want to disappoint love, people go to war for the idea. Now I want to say something else about the state: the state imposes its ego over its own ego as the will to rule. I resign myself. It exists through my resignation, my self-denial, my despondency, better known as humility. Does her courage make my submissiveness and give her dominion? It is not you who controls yourself, but the state and the idea that controls you. And when that happens, you automatically turn into ragamuffins. What I've also noticed is why people laugh. People laugh for one reason, out of schadenfreude. Tell jokes. Humiliating women, pie in the face or a kick in the ass, etc. There are also paradigms in music. The melodies reside in the universe and whoever brings them out first grinds first. The songs have always been there. We are taught to lie at a young age. And I will prove to you that lying is a survival instinct. Example: If I ask someone, have you shot a deer? - No, I haven't. If you lie, you are hiding something. And once you lie, you're not believed. But from a selfish point of view, I want to explain to you that lying is also good. For example: I am a spy and go into an enemy camp and get caught. And they ask me: Who are you? Are you telling the truth or are you lying? If you tell the truth, your friends die, if you lie, you save them. So lying is good in this situation. Or you are sitting in a revolutionary council meeting and then the police come in and ask your name. Do you tell the truth or do you lie? Of course you're lying. And he doesn't trust you either and asks for your ID card. So he's lying too, because he doesn't trust you. It's just like if you insult the king and someone listens and blows the whistle on you and you're brought before the royal court. If you tell the truth, you will be punished. If you lie, you save your head because they believe in your truth. So I'm lying to everyone and saving myself, so I'm an egoist and only thinking of my own skin at that moment. By lying, the state goes down and anarchy arises. The Caucasians were already in Europe 4000 BC. The Europeans got the indigenous language and skin color from them. They were the first to bring horses here and a plague 4000 years ago killed 90% of Europeans. It has been genetically proven that we are descended from the Caucasians. And then the Huns, the closest Caucasians, came to Europe and organized a migration of peoples. Their first law was the subjugation of all peoples. Where the sun rises, where the sun sets, all peoples should submit to the Huns. The Huns were all serial killers who were all beaten by their mothers. Either the stick defeats the man or the man defeats the stick. Of course, beating children is shit, but that was the culture with them. And if they beat the stick, it's because they've had their fear beaten out of them. They are as fearless and intrepid and unbreakable as an oak tree. And the children were already riding horses before they could take their first steps. They also gave their children scars on their faces immediately after birth so that grief and pain could be combined. And just as they trained their children, they also trained their horses. They were the only horses that could dig grass out of snow. The Huns were all socialists. They were the first to make treaties. If someone died in battle, the family received ten pounds of gold, which is about two million euros today, so that they could educate their children. And the leader of the Huns was Attila. Attila's father said that those who build walls are afraid. And he who takes revenge has no fear. Attila told this in the battle of the many peoples in the Catalan hills. The Romans thought they were the master race, the Greeks thought so and so did the Nazis. There was Western Rome and Eastern Rome before Attila, it was Attila who made Europe, not Charlemagne as they say. And where the Huns went, they went again. They called the Europeans "grain eaters" because the Huns were nomads. When they were hungry, they slaughtered a sheep and ate it with everyone. They were the first to have stirrup bows and everyone thought they had merged with their horses. And their bow was a reflex bow and was deadly accurate at 300 meters. And they always insulted the townspeople as birds living in golden cages, but they were free as birds and not trapped. And when they traded, you had to sit on a horse. They loved their horses more than their women. And they only kept the gambling dice and knew no law. Their philosophy was to always suck the host dry, but not to kill. Attila had advisors, the brothers Onegesius and Scottas. They were rhetoricians, the two brothers. And there was the advisor Eudoxius of the Bacauts. He was a French hospital doctor and had helped with peasant uprisings on the Loire two years earlier and then served as Attila's visor. The Goths said of Attila that he was fearless and cunning, but fought like a lion. And the Huns only took drugs, mushrooms, as you can see from their cooking pots, and they smoked marijuana for 4000 years. I tell you how you are all asleep. You are all trapped in metamorphosis because your consciousness does not allow you to recognize it. Example: If I pull you off with a trick and you don't know the puller trick and I pull you all off, then you will know the trick afterwards. And if you're newborn and don't know the trick, you can pull it off because you don't have the experience. Either you teach him or he learns from experience. And I know that the Illuminati know that we are slaves because we start from scratch every month. That's their system. And if I pull a trick on you, I get prison, but the capitalist has the monopoly to exploit us. "Respect property." That's the mistake of it all. Patent leather shoes or barefoot. And everyone should get 6,000 euros, no existential fear. Everyone should be a millionaire, not just a few. Competition is like that: Under socialism, everyone should get a plot, but then someone buys several plots and can offer their tomatoes more cheaply than those with the smaller plots. And of course everyone buys from the cheaper one and the small one can no longer sell his tomatoes and has to sell his plot to the big one and becomes a worker. And if you are a worker, you are always a slave. Or you make a contract with him if you are a socialist and then the prices become stable and nobody undercuts the price. You just have to organize, because masses make violence and violence makes law. The individual becomes an association, unites with others, then they become a great force. And then I explain to you that when there are rich people, there are poor people and when there are poor people, there are rich people. As long as there is property, there will always be this equation. And you can only achieve that if everyone has property or a stable wage of 6,000 € and not just 3% like the union, but full throttle. And if we want to fight the Illuminati, we have to print new money, then their money is worthless. And the machines belong to the workers. Then Germany sends machines all over the world to produce and we don't want competition. Because the problem with competition is that it creates dependency and everyone says we want to be like Germany. And if we are like Germany, then we are doing well. But that only works because we export and collect the capital and live well. So I want Germany to send machines everywhere so that they can produce and people can live well. That only works with machines. Example: There is a machine in England that makes a million loaves of bread a day with 70 men. It can even work with just 20 men. The owner sells the bread for 1.50 pounds, one pound of which is for him. That makes a million pounds a day, 7 million pounds a week, 30 million pounds a month and the workers only get a small wage. Rhetoricians are eloquent people. They know a solution to every problem. For example, I am a philosopher of words, a brain researcher and a behavioral scientist and I want to show the obsessed how obsessed they are when I attack their idea. A fixed idea is always when you are obsessed with it or submit to it. For example, if you go to a psychologist and he advises you and says that if you do something good ten times and something bad once, then the bad will test you better than the good. I am also an egoist and I am free and not bound. He who denies his ego is pleasing to the state. We should all strive for it, but not long for it. As long as you respect property, you will always become and remain a scoundrel. Violence always means parallel societies. The state only ever tolerates a minority that is allowed to exploit us, the capitalists, because they have the monopoly and exploit the ignorance of the proletariat, because they have been doing this for thousands of years. Because people are not stupid, but because they are kept ignorant. But trade unions and the mafia also live in a parallel society because they exploit the people. Only the union is there for the rights of the workers, they should be associations that are multiplied, then they become a mass. The worker must become independent and this can only be achieved through the goal of 6,000 euros for all. Then the workers are no longer the slaves, but the machines. Example: capitalists don't pay taxes, they add to the price and the end consumer pays everything. Violence is like this, for example: I'll explain to you how violence arises. If I kill a tiger, I'm right and if the tiger kills me, it's right. So whoever has violence is right, because only violence decides what is right. The state expresses its violence through laws. The state is an apparatus of violence, and if you don't obey, you will be punished. And in order to destroy the apparatus of violence, you have to show your counter-violence. The workers must force the state and the capitalists through the masses, they are an imposing power. And then they can assert themselves against the state, as individuals they are powerless. It's like a child forcing its parents to give it something. Then it is quiet. And the worker must act in the same way through socialist contracts. Take the example of the egoist: it must never be his cause, it must always be another cause that controls him. Be human, be a communist, be a fascist, be reasonable, be good, be moral, etc., otherwise you will end up in a moral institution or a sanatorium so that you can be made socially acceptable again. The anarchist is the laughing loser. He knows that he will win and is ahead of his time. And he submits to the rules because he has no experience or no idea that he can act in this way. Anarchy means a society without rulers, where the spirit of the anarchist does not submit to ideas. The anarchist says, trust no one and you will not be disappointed. You have to do everything yourself. An anarchist is highly intelligent and highly dangerous. Like being reasonable, being good, being a communist and being a fascist, etc. The anarchist disregards these rules because man subordinates his mind to an idea and believes in the idea and is mostly submissive to it. For example, is egoism good or bad? As an egoist, I say good. Example:: I say come on, let's go to war, then you say I don't want to. Then I say, how can you only think of yourself? In this way, the egoist only acts for his own benefit. The egoist always puts himself at the center before the idea. Example: The soldiers are standing in the trench and say to each other, look at the general on the hill, he's only thinking of himself. And the general shoots in the air and screams: For God and country! The soldiers march off for the idea and he stops because he only thinks of himself and selfishness is an instinct for survival. No child or animal knows patriotism and boundaries, they are taught that. For example, the story of Peter Schemel, who sold his soul to the devil and realized that he no longer had a shadow. That's the way it is with people. The ideas are above them, which he must obey in order for it to work. The individual person must not disappoint the idea. Dogmatism on the right and left Dogmatism on the right and left Dogmatism on the right One thing I want to say is: you don't become an evil, you decide to be an evil. The Nazis knew that they were evil. For example, when Hitler annexed Austria and gave them carte blanche and declared all Jewish countries outlawed for stealing, 1,300 people committed suicide in Vienna. The fascists do this by putting their people in positions of power everywhere, such as in the courts, the police and other violent apparatuses. Then they make the law work in their favor and no one can defend themselves because no one has weapons anymore. If everyone had had weapons, they would have been able to defend themselves. And the Nazis had academics and educated people who also took part. That's why I say that you don't become a Nazi, you choose to be one. Freedom is where you can say no. For example, the story of Rwanda, where one people and another lived in the same country, like the Kurds and the Turks. And the president's wife of the Hutus gave the command in a radio address to kill and destroy all Tutsis. Kill them all, she shouted, and the Hutus did it. They killed 800,000 Tutsis within 100 days, old people, children, women, everyone. That's when I say, you don't become a Böse, you choose Böse. You could have said no. Dogmatism on the left The people knew that Stalin was an Asian and he himself knew that he was an Asian. Example: Stalin and Trotsky had a rivalry after Lenin died. Then Trotsky wanted reforms because communism wasn't working and Stalin came up with a diabolical plan. Stalin's plan was, he said to the Duma, write your name on the ballot paper together with mine, if you vote for Trotsky, write Trotsky's name and your name on the ballot paper. Of the 5016 delegates, 5000 voted for Trotsky and only 16 voted for Stalin. Among the 16 was Khrushchev, the later president of Russia, who said that with Stalin he always had a gun under his pillow. With him, you had to expect anything. And Stalin killed all 5000 delegates and their families in order to stay in power. Another example is that he sent 20 million people to the Gulag who had worked for bread and water. He randomly selected thousands from different districts of a city to send them to the gulag in Siberia. Because nobody wanted to work in Siberia, he simply sent normal citizens to work in the gulags for no reason. And of the 20 million people, 2 million died. Stalin said: Man problem, clean up no problem. And Stalin always stood in front of the Duma for 40 minutes and was applauded for 40 minutes. And anyone who stopped early had to go to the gulag. The capitalist is not to blame for the misery, the worker is. The capitalist has established himself in society by saying: respect property. You should especially respect those above you. Through this one example, where the 70 workers each earn 45,000 dollars a year, but the boss makes one and a half billion dollars net a year with 70 workers, the workers themselves are to blame. If they were to say, no, brother, we'll split everything now, hop or top, then of course they'd rather hop for the workers. They can only achieve that with 6,000 € a month, no existential fear. It's just like Bertolt Brecht said in a quote: "When the stomach is full, they don't start thinking. When their stomach is empty, they start thinking. It's the same when you get a medal from the general and he thinks he owns Germany. He's as happy as a little child and doesn't realize that he's being taken for a ride because he's usually obsessed with the idea. It's just like giving a child a pair of pants and he's as happy as a lunatic, even though he could be entitled to more. But those who have not lost touch with reality are usually criminals. To achieve their goal, they have to commit crimes against the system. In order to achieve their goal, they do not deny their ego and their goal is to be rich, because you are only on this planet once. In order not to deny your ego, you have to go against the state, the ego and the state are opponents. The state wants me to be willing and I show my unwillingness by not denying my ego. And I am a drug dealer, I am a smuggler, I am paid by value. And that's why drugs need to be legalized and why drugs can bring states down. Even opium, the poppy plant, came from Italy or Spain 4,000 years ago. Alexander the Great always brought it with him to Afghanistan. Wherever he had fought battles, he had it planted during breaks and they drank it as "black wine" so that they would forget the atrocities of the battles. The wine was called "black wine" because they put clumps of opium in it and the whole of Rome was on it. Now we've talked about opium, but I only want cocaine and weed in my club and heroin and alcohol gone. 99% of heroin comes from Afghanistan and is produced there. That's why I have a different drug policy for Afghanistan, to grow hashish, because otherwise nothing will grow there. And every 6,000 euros and machines for the people for Afghanistan and everyone should carry weapons except the Taliban. One day in the Middle Ages there was a town that was rich, the town of Hamelin. And then two years of bad weather came and the rats came into the town and they became a plague. The town tried everything to get rid of the rats, but nothing worked. Then one day a man called Pfeifer came and wanted to talk to the mayor and the town council because he said, I'll get rid of the rats. The guards at the gate said, how are you going to do that? - Take me to the mayor. He said to the mayor and the council: I'll get rid of the rats and they all laughed at him. Then he spoke to them and they said. Yes, good. If you get rid of all the rats, we'll give you a reward. He named a price and they accepted. The whistler, the vagabond, went into the streets and whistled and all the rats followed him and drowned in the river and all the rats were gone. Then he went back to the town hall and wanted his money and the town said you won't get any money. Go back to where you came from. They threatened him with soldiers to leave the town and he left. He came back the next day and he whistled again and all the children followed him out of the town and they disappeared without a trace. Everyone in the town wept with grief. And the moral of the story is, you can't underestimate anyone, no matter who they are. You don't become a victim, you choose to be a victim. And the city decided in favor of the Böse and got a thrashing. So make the right decision, dear readers, the right one always comes along at some point. Why did Romeo want to marry Juliet? Because she was seized by lust. Or rather, she became selfish and thought only of herself, abandoning her family at that moment. Because the family has laws. If Julia had married the other man, the family would have been solvent, but she opted for lust, for love, but the other man would have been blessed with money for the family. But so she abandoned the family and chose love. My rights, my welfare, nothing comes above me. That's what all women should say. But that's only possible if women have guns and everyone has 6,000 euros. Now we come to society. Society means space, for example, and when people are in a space, they need rules to make the idea that someone has set up work. And if you break the rules of society, you are labeled an egoist. Because he has sought his own right in the masses to live well and decide for himself how to behave. This is how they maintain the hierarchy in the masses of society, because they see in everyone the evil that they supposedly want to control. And so the will of the people should decide about me, I should behave as it dictates. Otherwise it imposes the will of the ruler on me, it constricts me through laws. So I must betray my self, because I have given up my power, he wants me to deny my self. His thoughts should be my thoughts. They want me to remain minded. Many believe in this idea of the state, but they don't see that the state is exploiting them. They don't realize that they are asleep. Because of my humility and ignorance and dependence, he takes advantage of me so that I do not realize that I am a slave to the system, although with facts that I explain, you can see that you are a slave and you become aware of it. And you have to act accordingly. The ignorant must see what I explain, otherwise the world will end. I explain to people the mistakes they make when they act wrongly and enlighten them with my pros and cons, with my controversial topics. The will of the state is not my will The will of the state imposes its will on me so that I deny my will and its desires in order to be willing to be exploited by society. I am in favor of all bearing arms. Then there will be no more will to rule, then everyone will be dangerous and only recognize themselves as opponents. What does Pancho Villa say: Better to die upright than to live kneeling. And now we come to Socrates. Socrates, when the Athenians accused him of blasphemy and he was imprisoned, could have escaped with some Athenians, but he remained in the legal ground. If he had listened to selfishness, he would have escaped, but he listened to the idea. He thought they would acquit him. But they didn't, they executed him. There is no judge but himself. If he had escaped, he would have saved his life, but this way he listened to the state and accepted the law of the state. And if, for example, criminals have committed a bank robbery and the children hear about it and say: "Wow, they had balls!" and the father hears about it, then he says: "What?! You're being punished because you're not allowed to think that's good." But that's the solution, the egoist can only realize himself in crime because he doesn't respect property and doesn't want to lose sight of his goal. Lots of money and a good life, after all, we are only here once on this planet to live a rich life. So if you commit crimes, if you break the law, you have balls. For example, is hate good or bad? Ex. hate: I hate war, I hate killing, I hate painting, etc. Ex. good: I think killing is good, I think war is good, I think painting is good, etc.
And why is that so? Because "good" must not be misused, because "good" is the Lord, who has taken care of the good, and "bad" is the opponent. For example, the general says to his soldiers, you get a medal because you killed 10 men, you are good. But you are bad because you have deserted, you have betrayed us. You'll get the death penalty for that, because he betrayed his "self", because he didn't kill, because he didn't listen and did his own thing. I tell you, independence is good, better than freedom. To be captive is to be subordinate. But originality calls you back to yourselves, because originality is, for example: your own thoughts, your own will, your own behavior and your own rights. You only come to your own will if you were unwilling and disinclined in your youth, that is the first step towards originality. And then, of course, you turn into an egoist who only thinks of himself. And that's why, as egoists, we all have to join together in associations, we are then a bigger sword, and that's how we can free ourselves through compulsion. Every thought of liberation is a thought of anarchy, because freedom is just an empty word. You free yourself from your problems, but what happens next? For example, I am free from my master who whipped me, humiliated me, because I was the only one who was humiliated by him. The slaves have to organize themselves, today they are the workers, the proletariat. They have to organize themselves, then it multiplies into a respectable mass, which is also violence. A very interesting violence when you look at it. The workers have to organize themselves and see the jobs as their own and no longer accept the boss as the boss, even if he were to cry. And that is then an association of the lazy party. Freedom in this state is only a certain freedom that we get, like a dog on a chain or a hamster in a wheel. If we were to get complete freedom, we wouldn't need the state. And then it would dissolve into anarchy and the law of its will, the state, would be lost and worthless. Communication is the essence of freedom, coercion cannot convince, because coercion is a ruler's will that rules over me. The idea only works if everyone listens. They bind themselves to the laws, which are only a disadvantage for themselves, not an advantage for their own thoughts and will. That is why the egoist says, for example: My thoughts, my rights, my actions, my money, my desires, etc. Ecology and economics are consolidated together in our society. For example: If nature would fight back, we would not treat it like this. For example, we would help the environment and the workers, because the economy always steers towards destroying the environment because it doesn't fight back. And I have a plan for that: we build machines and devices that last for 100 years and longer, so we protect nature and jobs. In 1920, Osram invited all the capitalists to Berlin and they agreed that all the goods had to break, otherwise their system wouldn't work. And who suffers? The proletariat and nature, of course. Now we come to the economy: let the machines work for only half a year, that protects jobs and nature. Of course, the machines have to do everything The standard of living then increases. We have to take breaks, the industry has to take a break for at least 7 years and work for 3 years. And everyone gets 6,000 euros, no more existential fear when the machines work for the people; a society of made people. That's why I always say, patent leather shoes or bare feet. I'll tell you about another factory owner who is a hyper-capitalist. He makes one and a half billion dollars with 70 men and the 70 men just make sure that the machines run and the tomato paste fills the cans. And the capitalist's machines produce as much as the whole of Italy in a year. He earns 4 million dollars a day, that's more than 120 million dollars a month. That's more than one and a half billion dollars a year. Of that, the workers, the 70 men, only get 3.5 million dollars a year and he makes one and a half billion a year, that's a pitiful and selfish profit. Why do the workers put up with it? If they organize and lose respect for property, then everyone has property from the workers. This is a pragmatic point of view and therefore appropriate to the subject matter, because Räte are a pragmatic invention of the moment. Power does not disappear as a result of a test structure, but it is neutralized as far as possible. True to the motto: Spread the power so that it doesn't make anyone powerless! The worker does not know that he is a slave. They are not made aware of it because that is their system. If the proletariat gets smart, as I tell them, the Illuminati can shove the money. They are not incentivized to think like they are asleep. We only live on this planet once, we don't come back a second time, we have to enjoy our lives. So for us, that means working as little as possible. And that only works if machines work for us. For every 6,000 €, man and woman are 12,000 €. But in our system, people don't see and recognize that. There's a Kurdish saying that goes: you see the branch but not the forest. That's how it is, people have to realize that they are worth more than 2,000 €, that's why I say that they are worth as much as a diamond. You can't sell yourself short. We can only achieve this through associations and machines, so that no one is lost in the collective. I am a virus, when I tell stories, I stimulate their brains to think further. And then they can no longer think it away, it solidifies in their brain. Like, for example, love creates hate, right or wrong speech and the 100 € deposit that the Illuminati told me. If there is one tongue, there are many ears. I make them aware of how the brain works by talking right and wrong. Because they can't get any further with how the brain works, but by talking right and wrong they can't think the paradigm away because the paradigm is important. Loyalty is the sign of goodness. Then the communist says: He is a good communist, he is a good fascist, because he hates. The Lord is the idea that you must serve and not disappoint. It's like a glass vase full of rules, because he serves and does not disappoint. The Nazis used to say: If you don't keep quiet, you'll be sent to Dachau concentration camp. And that's why all people have to carry guns. And accept everyone as an opponent, they won't dare to kill you. There's the saying: Anyone who thinks differently is an enemy. Anyone who thinks differently is our enemy. And that's why we all have to see each other as one big family and respect and accept each other. Machno was a peasant guerrilla leader. They had had four years of anarchy in the Ukraine and that's how Machno started: He killed a general when he was 17 and because he was only 17, he was pardoned and sent to St. Peter's Fortress for life because he was too young to be executed. And he studied geography because he knew that he would eventually get out of St. Peter's Fortress when the revolution started. And that began in Russia in 1917. Then he was able to get out and went to Ukraine and made revolution. In the end there were 80,000 fighters who fought against White Russia and against the Zeska and were involved in several fronts. These were the first guerrilla fighters. At that time there were two communist ideological groups, the socialist and the anarchist. Only the anarchists were screwed by the Bolsheviks and terrorized. I'll just say one thing that the Bolsheviks said: Anyone who thinks differently is our enemy. But Machno was an imposing force and a thorn in the side of the communists, because socialist communism didn't work and the workers were then forced by force to adopt their ideologies. And they set such a trap for Machno, it was Machiavelli's art of intrigue: they let them fight their opponents and when they were weak, they killed them. And in Russia they killed 20,000 anarchists in Kronstadt in 1921 and the sailors who started the revolution in Russia. They killed them all. And then in 1922 they killed the Machno rebels in Ukraine and Machno was able to escape and emigrated to France. He died impoverished in exile in Paris in 1935. And that is why it is always said that history is written by the winners. But the losers also write history, so that we learn from our mistakes. Trust no one. If you love freedom, you always end up with anarchism. The goal of the anarchist is the abolition of the rule of man over man. Willful reluctance and violence What does Jesus say? Turn the right cheek, turn the left cheek, that is the highest non-violence there is. But you get further with violence. Because violence means mass and mass makes violence. Even Genghis Khan said that. What did Genghis Khan say on his deathbed after he broke his hands in a riding accident? I am neither good nor bad, I am Genghis Khan. The willing ones were the Egyptians, the Romans and the Greeks and the whole of European civilization, all willing peoples. Those who obey the laws of a system are willing. The unwilling find their way through crime. The Chinese are the most willing people in the world. Genghis Khan defeated a million Chinese soldiers with milk. How? The soldiers have to be fed, a million Chinese soldiers who have run all over China. And the Chinese can't stand milk. And so Genghis Khan defeated the soldiers and with 100,000 men he crushed and killed a million Chinese soldiers because the Mongols drank the milk from their horses. And then they controlled 150 million Chinese with 100,000 men and every Mongol had the jackpot, 70 women and money without end, millions and billions. The Chinese thought that everything would stay the same, just with a new ruler. Genghis Khan became the new ruler. Example: When I do something, I have to make decisions. So your conscience decides whether to kill him or not. That's why everyone has to carry weapons and the monopoly of violence belongs to the citizen. Only violence makes law. The Nazis in particular had no conscience because they took the law on their side and were obsessed with their racial ideas. The first people they gassed were not the Jews or gypsies, but the mentally ill who could not be cured. And I have paranoid schizophrenia myself, I, the writer Selman. Hitler's second man was Göring. The Nazis liked jokes, because jokes are always racist. And so he, Göring, always tested whether someone was a real Nazi or not with a joke. The joke goes like this: Adolf Hitler went to the psychiatrists in an asylum and said that people had to say "Heil Hitler" in two years' time. After two years, Hitler came back to the psychiatric ward and everyone shouted "Heil Hitler", the mentally ill. And then Hitler looked around and asked why the guards weren't shouting "Heil Hitler". They then said they weren't mad after all. And if you laugh, you're a Nazi and if you don't laugh, you knew you couldn't do anything with the soldier and you knew whether he was a reliable or unreliable Nazi. They wanted to get rid of the problem of the mentally ill and gassed them miserably with LPG. And the action was called T4. It was a euthanasia program for the destruction of inferior life. They were so obsessed with the preservation of the race, the purity of the race. And why were they like that? Because the citizens could not defend themselves, because they were willing. If they had fought back and if they had all carried pistols, if it had not gone so far, then he would have had opponents who would have fought back, unwilling, ill-mannered, disrespectful, fearless, reluctant. And let's not forget that Hitler came to power through democracy, they all voted for him. And so he was able to realize his madness. The first law when a system is created among the citizens: first they steal your weapons and then they steal your freedom of speech and stab you in the back and force you to be good, a good worker, a good citizen. So he must then act for the idea and submit himself and his spirit to a rule or an idea. The mind submits to the law of the willless, which then controls it. This is called the state or ideology, which the mind submits to and which it can no longer control. Wolves share, dogs don't share The capitalists are dogs, they don't share because the law is on their side. Respect property. The worker has lost touch with reality The worker who sleeps does not realize that he is a slave. As Sherlock Holmes said to Doctor Watson: They see, but they do not realize that they are slaves. They don't realize that they have to start all over again every month. I have cracked the world formula: i.e. that we are all voluntary slaves and we are supposed to decide democratically, but these are not our own decisions. That's why I propose a way for the workers that all workers get 6,000 euros. It could be communist, but I am an anarchist socialist. We anarchists control from the bottom up, not from the top down. And 6,000 euros each for everyone from the age of 18 until death. And not like the lottery, where only one person wins the 6,000 &euros;, but then everyone, but that doesn't fit into their scheme. Or rather their system. And I awaken the people. They should be free like wild rats and not like a hamster in a cage. Or rather, laws are like invisible walls that you are not allowed to cross, like a dog on a chain. Machines for the people, work must go. Work as little as possible, the difficult work and the complicated and dangerous work must be done by machines. And every 6,000 €, no existential fear. We are so thoroughly religious that "jurors" condemn us to death, and every police officer, as a good Christian, puts us in the hole by "oath of office". It was only from then on that morality was able to come into opposition to piety, where the roaring hatred against everything that resembled an "order" (ordinance, commandments, etc.) was born. Consequently, it could only achieve independence through liberalism, whose first form as "civilization" gained importance in world history, and weakened the actual religious powers (see "Liberalism" below). For the principle of morality, which does not merely accompany frivolity but stands on its own feet, no longer lies in the divine commandments, but in the law of reason, from which those, insofar as they are still to remain valid, must first expect the justification for their validity. In the laws of reason, man is determined by himself, for "man" is rational, those laws necessarily arise from the "essence of man". Fraternity and morality differ from each other in that the former makes God, the latter man, the lawgiver. From a certain point of view of morality, we reason as follows: Either man is driven by his sensuality, and following it he is immoral, or he is driven by the good, which, taken up into the will, is called a moral disposition (disposition and commitment to the good): then he proves himself to be moral. From this point of view, how can Sand's act against Kotzebue, for example, be called immoral? What one understands by immoral, it was certainly to the same extent as, among others, the thievery of St. Crispin in favor of the poor. "He should not have murdered, for it is written: Thou shalt not murder!" So to serve the good, the good of the people, as Sands at least intended, or the good of the poor, as Crispin did, that is moral; but murder and theft are immoral: the end is moral, the means immoral. Why? "Because murder, assassination, is something absolutely evil." If the guerrillas lured the country's enemies into ravines and shot them down unseen from the bushes, was that not assassination? According to the principle of morality, which commands us to serve the good, you could only ask whether murder could never be a realization of the good, and you would have to acknowledge the murder that realized the good. You cannot condemn Sands' deed: it was moral because it was in the service of the good, because it was selfless; it was an act of punishment carried out by the individual, an execution carried out at the risk of his own life. In the end, what was his undertaking other than to suppress writings by brute force? Do you not know the same procedure as a "legal" and sanctioned one? And what objection can be made to it on the basis of your principle of morality? - "But it was an unlawful execution." So the immorality of it was the illegality, the disobedience to the law? So you admit that goodness is nothing other than the law, morality nothing other than loyalty. Your morality must also sink down to this "loyalty", to this hypocrisy of the fulfillment of the law, except that the latter is both more tyrannical and more empowering than the former hypocrisy. For with the former only the deed was needed, but you also need the attitude: one should carry the law, the statute within oneself and he who is most lawful-minded is the most moral. Even the last serenity of Catholic life must perish in this Protestant legalism. Only here, finally, is the rule of law complete. Not "I live, but the law lives in me." So I have really come so far as to be only the "feeling of its (the law's) glory". "Every Prussian carries his Gensd'armen in his breast" - says a high Prussian officer. Why do certain oppositions not want to prosper? Simply because they do not want to leave the path of morality or legality. Hence the moderate hypocrisy of devotion, love, etc., the repugnance of which can daily cause the greatest disgust with this corrupt and hypocritical relationship of a "legal opposition". - In the moral relationship of love and fidelity, a contradictory, an opposing will cannot take place; the beautiful. No, it must renounce the will in order to live for love, for freedom - for love of morality. It must never "claim as a right" what it is only allowed to "ask for as a favor". Love, devotion etc. demands with inevitable certainty that there is only one will to which others surrender, which they serve, follow, which they love. Whether this will is considered reasonable or unreasonable: in both cases one acts morally if one follows it, and immorally if one withdraws from it. The will that commands censorship seems unreasonable to many; but he who submits his book to censorship in the land of censorship acts immorally, and he who submits it to it acts morally. If someone acknowledged his moral judgment and set up a secret press, for example, he would have to be called immoral, and unwise to boot, if he allowed himself to be caught; but will such a person claim to have any value in the eyes of the "moral"? Perhaps! - If, after all, he imagined that he was serving a "higher morality". The fabric of today's hypocrisy hangs on the marks of two areas between which our time hovers and sticks its fine threads of deception and self-deception. No longer strong enough to serve morality unquestionably and unabashedly, not yet reckless enough to live entirely for selfishness, it trembles in the cobweb of hypocrisy, sometimes to one side and sometimes to the other, and is cursed by the curse of half-heartedness, only stupid, miserable masks. If one has once dared to make a "free" proposal, one immediately wastes it again with assurances of love and feigns resignation; if, on the other hand, one has had the temerity to beat back the free proposal with moral references to trust, etc., one's moral courage immediately sinks and one assures how one hears the free words with special pleasure, etc.: one feigns recognition. In short, one should have the one, but not do without the other: one should have a free will, but not lack the moral one. - Come together, you liberals, you serviles. You will give every word of freedom a look of the most loyal confidence, and he will clothe his servilism in the most flattering phrases of freedom. Then you part, and he, like you, thinks: I know you, fox! He smells the devil in you as well as you smell the old dark Lord God in him. A Nero is only a "good" man in the eyes of the "good guys"; in mine he is nothing but a possessed man, just like the good guys. The good ones see him as an archbull and delegate him to the hells. Why did nothing hinder him in his despotism? Why did they put up with so much? Were the tame Romans, who allowed themselves to be bound by the will of such a tyrant, a hair's breadth better? In ancient Rome he would have been executed immediately if he had never become a slave. But the current "good men" among the Romans only opposed him with their moral demands, not their will; they sighed over the fact that their emperor did not pay homage to morality as they did: they themselves remained "moral subjects" until one finally found the courage to give up "moral, obedient subservience". And then the same "good people", who as "obedient subjects" had endured all the humiliation of being without will, rejoiced at the sacrilegious, immoral act of the empowerer. Where was the courage for revolution among the "good guys", which they now praised after someone else had seized it? The good guys could not have had the courage, because a revolution, and even an insurrection, is always something "immoral", which you can decide to do if you stop being "good" and either become "evil", or - neither. Nero was no worse than his time, when you could only be one of the two, good or evil. His time had to judge him: he was bad, and in the highest degree, not a dull one, but an archbull. All moral people can only pass this judgment on him. Scoundrels like him still live on today (see, for example, the memoirs of the Knight of Lang) among the moral. It is not, however, comfortable to live among them, since one's life is never certain for a moment; but is it more comfortable to live among the moral? One is just as little sure of one's life, only that one is hanged "in the way of right", but one is least sure of one's honor, and the national cockade flies away in a glance around. The coarse fist of morality deals mercilessly with the noble nature of egoism. "But you can't put a scoundrel and an honest man on the same line!" Well, no one does that more than you judges of morality, indeed even more than that, you lock up an honest man who speaks openly against the existing state constitution, against the sacred institutions, etc., as a criminal, and you leave portfolios and even more important things to a mischievous scoundrel. So in practice you have nothing to reproach me with. "But in theory!" Well, I do indeed place them both on the same line as two opposite poles: both on the line of the moral law. They both only have meaning in the "moral" world, just as in pre-Christian times a lawful Jew and an unlawful Jew only had meaning and significance in relation to the Jewish law, whereas before Christ the Pharisee was nothing more than a "sinner and a tax collector". In the same way, the moral Pharisee is just as important before the law as the immoral sinner. Nero's obsession made him very uncomfortable. But a man of his own would not foolishly oppose him with the "holy" in order to complain when the tyrant does not respect the holy, but his will. How often is the sanctity of inalienable human rights held up to the enemies of the same and some freedom or other demonstrated and paraded as a "sacred human right". Those who do this deserve to be laughed at, as it really happens to them, if they do not actually, even if unconsciously, take the path that leads to the goal. They suspect that once the majority has been won over to that freedom, they will want it and then take what they want. They will never procure the sanctity of freedom and all possible proofs of this sanctity: lamentation and petitioning only show beggars. The moral man is necessarily narrow-minded in that he knows no other enemy than the "immoral". "Whoever is not moral is immoral!", and therefore rejected, wicked, etc. That is why the moral person can never understand the egoist. Man is an idea. If you follow the idea, then you must subjugate yourself and your thoughts. The true human being is an anarchist. He is not afraid of the laws that people make for other people so that the rich become even richer, the minority. Democracy can be abused. The Jacobins during the French Revolution of 1789 loved the people, that's why they fought them. The Jacobins came to power on the ballot paper and then they killed the people. That's why I don't trust any democracy or ballot paper and certainly not any dictatorship. Adolf Hitler also came to power with democracy and took over the apparatus of violence. For the Nazis, this meant that anyone who thinks differently is our enemy. That's how they terrorized Germany and nobody could defend themselves because nobody had weapons. And that's how he used his power, he was a sadist. That's why all people have to carry weapons, so that they can defend themselves against opponents and respect each other as enemies. I, Selman Kum, better known as the Rat, was prevented from getting my book onto the world market. They didn't want to make people smart if they had published my book, but the German state and the world powers prevented that, the top brass. Abdul Krim was a Berber who fought against the colonial forces in the Reef Mountains. He had once killed 12,000 Spanish soldiers in a battle in a gorge. As a result, the French and the Spanish wanted to give up.
The story goes like this: The princes gutted their farmhands and peasants like a Christmas goose. They were oppressed by their lords and then the longbow was invented. They were then able to shoot down the princes with the longbow. The princes became very sweet and well-behaved to the peasants out of fear. So the tie was at eye level again. That is why we achieve justice by force.
When the fascists seized power in 1933, they passed a law: All those who do not go to work or benefit society are sterilized. These were the gamblers, drug addicts and work-shy drifters and vagabonds. They were sterilized by the state.
Patriots believe in their idea because they are so obsessed with the idea that they kill people. And if you're not shot at the front of the battlefield, you'll be shot from behind by the general.
So you die for your country, you're dead either way, because death knows no rules, it's either him or me.
TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW
In Africa, nobody has 20 cents to survive, but a 20,000 dollar gun. We Germans pay money to Rheinmetall so that they can build weapons and give them to Africa. So we are paying for death. That's why I say: weapons for everyone. In America they shoot each other, children, teachers, etc. Why not in Switzerland? There a Döner costs 15,- € and you can buy weapons as you like. All you need is a safe.
With Pancho Villa, I want to tell you how violence works for them. The first dictator they defeated was Diaz. And the elected president then became Madero. Madero then said to Pancho Vila, give up your weapons, you don't have to worry, nobody can hurt you anymore. Hand in your weapons.
Jokes are always racist. Example: What's a bully on a garbage can? Homeowner.
They say that the Greeks are the model for democracy. Now I will explain to you why they praised democracy so much. They were all Nazis because they had slaves, they did the dirty work for them. Women weren't allowed to vote in democracy either.
In the Republic, all workers organize a master who controls them for 4 years. Of course they all carry guns so that they stay cool and organize everything so that everything runs smoothly in the republic. And the power is distributed in such a way that nobody gets angry, so everyone carries guns, women, men, everyone.
Freedom is man's greatest good, as the Spartans, Huns, Mongols and Caucasians already knew. Freedom gives rise to free will.
The basic income cannot work in rich countries because it exploits poor countries. It's a statism of exploitation, i.e. the vagabonds are kept quiet so that capital can accumulate its money. The people in the rich countries forget that the poor countries are exploited and thus finance their capital. The basic income system doesn't work because the poor countries can't finance it, because at some point they will run out of capital and the rich, the minority, will get richer and richer.
All people run after money, rich and poor. Instead of us running after money, money has to run after us. And that is my goal: that everyone has 6,000 euros and no existential fear until death.
All mafia criminals are born with handcuffs. For example, when a thief steals a 20-million-dollar Ferrari, he is relieving himself of poverty. That is why all workers must organize against the state that promotes the minority and has the monopoly to exploit us. That is why I say that he who denies his ego is pleasing to the state. They should all strive for it, but not demand it. So all egoists must organize themselves. That way we all get the same rights, not like the communists, where you have to start from scratch. And then you work for the state, for society or towards poverty, you become a lumpen and you make yourself dependent on communist society. If that breaks down, everything breaks down. That's why I'm proposing an anarchist-egoist party and everyone should vote for me, all of humanity. I lead them to the goal of being independent. Independent of family, of the state, of society, of capital, etc. Only the association promotes you, because then you are the masses with the same interests and goals. Then you are an impressive mass and that's it.
Many doctors and many patients don't know how schizophrenia works, they always think you're being followed and watched and picked on, whether it's the city or the state, like me, or the whole world. Now I'll tell you how schizophrenia actually works: schizophrenia is a hereditary disease. I can see that there is a host inside me that controls me. I got it from my mother and she got it from her father, my grandfather. The alien host controls me and when I get well, I can control myself again with pills.
Brain networking comes from experience. If you only go to work and go home every day, you have no experience, no networking. And you can only network your brain if you know how the law of the road works. There are two schools that you learn in life: the ABCs at school and the ABCs on the street, knowledge of human nature.
Example: Always act rationally, be moral, and they sort out the system, how best to act so that the system works and the masses go down collectively. Your mind is haunted, the idea controls it, the spook, and the spook has power over it because it is obsessed with the idea of being socialist, communist, fascist, and so on.
My mother was a horror show. I found out a few years ago with 97 euros in my account that I was worth 5 million.
My mother was ill, she could freak out at any moment. Sometimes it would build up slowly and you knew something was about to happen and could prepare yourself for it. But it could also come on like a bolt of lightning without you realizing beforehand that something was building up. She sometimes paced around the apartment for hours. She beat us with her hands, with objects, with a broomstick, I still have it today, it's going into a museum. Either the stick beats you or you beat the stick. It even pulled my sister's hair around the apartment, back and forth in front of my brother and me, with my sister on it. That's when I first thought about murder, at the age of 6, and that you have to make a decision, and I've made the right decision four times in my life. When I was 6, my mother was lying on the couch asleep and I decided not to kill her for fear that she might survive and kill me in revenge. You can imagine that there is often a lot of stress when a 6-year-old boy seriously considers killing his mother and thinks through the pros and cons. And the neighbors have heard it all, when three kids are crying, you hear it. And you see it at school. It didn't bother me at school, but I was still annoyed. When I started school, I was the child without a bonbon, I was given an empty tee for the photo and had to look at the camera and stare into the light because I was angry. I still have the photo. I was also beaten at school, even personally by the principal of the school, Mr. Messerschmitt, and later also by nuns. And so it went on. I was beaten at home and at school too, so I already knew how it worked. I was no longer allowed to go out at break time because I was hitting other children. Everyone more or less scared everyone. I grew into that. I had trouble at home and at school too, but the two children stayed apart because my mother couldn't speak German. My father was away all the time, he was a gambler and a worker and sometimes you're lucky and sometimes you're not.My mother was already difficult before I knew her, she was from deepest Kurdistan and that wasn't happiness for her either. She couldn't do anything here, couldn't speak the language, couldn't read or write and her husband was never around, she didn't have any girlfriends and didn't know anyone and of course she was frustrated and paced around the apartment, swearing and full of anger and we couldn't understand her. It gnawed at her and she poured all her obsession into this gnawing. She couldn't defend herself against it and she couldn't control herself and she passed it on to us, i.e. she took her frustration on and off, but that didn't really work, because then you immediately get frustrated again, but she also passed these things on to us, especially to me. I got rid of the stick and I still have it today, it's in my apartment. We no longer believed in anything. We saw how they took our mother in a straitjacket in a VW bus to Bedburg-Hau, the famous psychiatric sanatorium in North Rhine-Westphalia, on the Niederrein in the fields towards Holland. Where you are made socially acceptable again. Two edges, two two-meter nurses could hardly get them in their jackets, they were so wild. After that we were sent to a home. I went into one home on my own, my brother and sister went into another and our mother went to Bedburg-Hau. Diagnosis: paranoid schizophrenia, which is not something like depression or anything like that. Depression is perhaps a heavy blanket and with schizophrenic psychosis the blanket attacks you and you can't control it, but it is you and it knows you, but you don't know it. That's how stupid it is. And it can be transmitted from person to person, like a host. My mother was in it for a long time, a year to a year and a half, until she was put on tablets. I visited her once, she was sitting there like a statue pumped full of Heidol and that was in the mid-seventies. My mother was in Bedburg-Hau and we were in a home, I was in a different home to my siblings for a year and a half and I can't remember any of it. My mother came back when she was seven and my siblings and I have my memories too.
I went to Klitschko's office in Kiev to give them my book. I also gave the book to all the staff in his office and told them to read it while I was waiting there. Immediately (5 page introduction). You read now, please. I had my t-shirt from the good, the bad and the ugly on. Selinski was not yet president. Crimea had already been annexed by the Russians, but they'd been there the whole time anyway. Who knows what they were thinking. Who is that? CIA? Mossad? MI 5? Shit! I was telling them: Machines for the people, 6,000 euros each, welcome to socialism, that's the name of my book.
What does corona have to do with eugenics? It starts even before Huxley. His book Brave New World was a protest against his father, who was also a eugenics theorist. The philosophy of the thing that the weak must be eliminated. That goes back to the Darwin fans, evolution, survival of the fittest. The opposite of Darwin's book is by Peter Kropotkin and is called Mutual Aid. He took the musk oxen as an example, which help the calves and the weak (animal model). Peter Kropotkin was an anarchist, mutual aid is cooperation as the opposite model to competition and war.
Taking, but not giving anything back to nature, that won't end well. We also have to give something back to nature, otherwise it will end badly for us. It's exactly 12 o'clock, not a minute more or less. People have to build devices that last 200 years. That way we protect nature and the workers. There must be no more rich ideas. I want to be a billionaire must disappear; the fact that people say: I want €8,000 now, no longer €6,000, has risen because of inflation. If we have the idea of being rich, of being a billionaire, nature suffers because people are always buying new things and earning a billion more. He can't even spend the money.
The pirate flag is the sign of anarchy. Whether you steal a ship or a chicken, the punishment is the same, the death penalty. What does a pirate say: Short life, good life (pirate motto). If they capture a ship, they are made men. They have not only attacked ships, but also emptied cities. Do you know why pirates wear gold earrings? I'll tell you: so that they get a good burial. The new pirates are called mafia in our time.
Now I will tell you how they crammed slaves together on a ship, 1,300 men. Before they crammed them in, they chose two men and cut them up alive so that no one would mutiny. And the ships, when they came to the harbor, people smelled them from afar, didn't see them, the ships stank so bad. And when the ships were at sea and someone fell ill because the slaves had to lie and eat in their own excrement, they simply threw them overboard. Out of 1,300 men, only 1,000 survived.
For the individual person, chaos is only fair. We live with inhibitions in this world, we don't take what we want. We are told how to live by laws. If we have no inhibitions, we have chaos. In chaos, people will organize themselves into associations with the same interests, the same covenant. Then they will organize themselves and free society from the state, the citizens, when they realize how the hare runs. Machines also work in the dark. Machines are the best workers, but they have to work for everyone. There are even satellites that control how high the combine harvester should cut the grass from 43,000 km away. There are even pizzerias where only machines work. That's good for the masses.
TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW
Crooked thoughts are just like throwing rats into a hole with food and water, then they live normally. If you give them nothing, no water and no food, they start to think crooked thoughts. It's the same with humans.
Honor is when I'm in Colombia and make money with cocaine. But it turned out differently for me because I want fame. I want to be in world history and help people with my book. When people read my book, they know how I think. I want to free society from the state. I've cracked the world formula: the Illuminati are screwing people because they have to start over every month. When I say to a woman: You're a slave, she says: I'm not a slave, I'm going to work. But if I say you start from scratch every month, then she starts to think and realizes: I'm right. And then she becomes dangerous, because she starts to think. And that's why we all have to start thinking and listen to Selman.
The worker is poorly paid and kept dependent. They are always dreaming and hoping, or so everyone thinks, everyone wants to get out of work. And unfortunately, only very few succeed in this system, the others fall by the wayside.
Pablo Escobar was a Colombian who was totally dangerous. I just want to emphasize that I have studied violence in theory and practice in order to tell you how the hare runs in this system. Why people have to work out of necessity
Because they have to start from scratch every month. With the fascists and communists, you have to expect forced labor. The Philistines the good talkers
The philistines, the good talkers, always want to convince you of the good, that you serve and follow the collective. Give up everything and follow me, is their motto.
Now I'm going to tell you how to lose 1 kg a day without exercise and without dieting. You just have to listen to what I'm about to tell you.
I shape people's brains with my thoughts and give them a consciousness so that they can think for themselves. I show them the advantages and disadvantages of systems and ideas that only work if you listen. You are not allowed to produce your own will, you have to be will-less for the system.
They know we are slaves because we start from scratch every month. If you don't understand the truth, you're stupid, but if you understand the truth and don't tell it, you're a criminal. They know we are slaves because we start from scratch every month. That's their system, it's not a workers' system, it's a capitalist system. And that's why I fight in Germany, because in other countries I get shot if I tell the truth.
At the time, Pablo Escobar was the 13th richest man in the world. The American state did not prosecute him because of the drugs, but because of the dollars that went to Colombia. The state goes under when it no longer has any capital. That's why I'm a Pablo Escobar fan, because he was also a Pancho Villa fan and a Bonny & Clyde fan. He has the same virus as me, the criminal virus. What does Pancho Villa say: "The Spaniards gave us the church and the whip. The dictator Huerta said: "We can control President Maero, he's a mouse. But Pancho Villa and Zapatta are tigers, we can't control them. So we have to cut off the head of the snake, said Huerta, then the organization of Pancho Villa and Zapatta will go down. And they really did it, the pigs. And so the workers couldn't learn and neither could the Americans, otherwise the Illuminati could shove the money elsewhere. You have to come out of metamorphosis so that we are all butterflies, free to tease all the flowers.
TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW
Rheinmetall is allowed to sell weapons, I am not. Where is the morality in that? If I kill a person in America, I get the death penalty. But if American soldiers kill Colombian guerrillas in Colombia, they don't get the death penalty. Where is the morality in that? When I sell a customer a gun, I say: You are responsible if you kill or kill a person. Then you have the monopoly. Then I can think that away. And if Rheinmetall supplies weapons to Kiev, the taxpayers are all the murderers, because Ukraine has already cost 1.6 trillion dollars in one year. The biggest profit is made by the arms dealers. Like bang, boom, boom, the money is gone, gone. Only the arms dealers get the money.
TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW
The power of money: What does Toni Montana say? If you want women in America, you need money, and if you have money, you have power, and if you have power, you can get any woman you want. Toni is right about that. Life is made difficult for us humans
According to Tagesschau, mental illnesses have doubled in the last ten years. Due to crises, inflation, war, psychological warfare, state terror and the like from the marriage between the free market and the corrupt state and when the state is corrupt it makes its citizens ill. People are kept helpless by staged crises and the corrupt state acts like a manipulator in abusive relationships. People are made sick by a cocktail of threats, worries and bad rumors and fears, distractions, confusions and the more confused people are the more difficult it is for them to make sensible plans. This is deliberately manipulated existential angst. People have to play the role of victim
Example: The rat observes from its cover whether the coast is clear, whether there are no foxes, owls, hawks, bears or leopards in the area. In this system, man has always been the victim. Born as victims and learn as victims. Born to lose, born to lose. This is also called cannon fodder and I wouldn't mention it if so many hadn't been fed to the cannons in just these few days of January this year. Ukraine and Gaza are the current frontrunners in the casualty toll and the people in Gaza are already ahead in terms of numbers. The world has not become safer in recent years. And that's why I have a plan for Gaza: both Israelis and Palestinians have to get out and then it will be turned into a pilgrimage site for all religions. If someone has 10 houses, he gets 10 houses in Canada or wherever he wants. There is a solution for every social problem. The road is rocky, but worthwhile. As the entire politics of humanity trapped in the role of victim. In the German story, the fox is the bad guy. What does the whole say to the fox, fox I know you. Dictators always feel threatened from outside and from within and the people have to go along with it, should go along with it, do go along with it. Insulting the dictator in North Korea is like committing suicide. In 500 years there will be a new race, the mixed race of humans. Then there will be no peoples fighting each other. The world is like a city, with the rich in the north and the poor in the south, as well as in the world. Kropotkin says mutual aid, everyone gets machines so that they can produce and the machines have to last a hundred years. That way we protect the workers and nature.
TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION TO THE BASIC IDEAS OF ANARCHISM SOMETHING ABOUT CONFUSION "be realistic, demand the impossible!" "exaggeration is the beginning of invention." -Wall slogans in Paris May As everyone knows, an anarchist is a violent person, a murderer. it is also common knowledge that anarchists are terrorists to whom human life means nothing, but chaos means everything. OR?? But of course! every child knows that. on 19.12.69 the 'Secolo d' Italia' defined an anarchist as follows: "a wild, obscene beast, corroded to the core by communist syphilis! " The famous doctor and criminologist Sare Lombroso knows even better: for him, all anarchists are "idiots or congenital criminals who also have a general limp, are disabled and have asymmetrical facial features." Are anarchists even human? There is nothing to suggest that they are, because even in the part of the world that calls itself communist, there is nothing good to say about the legendary anarchist. "petty bourgeois slobs", "voluntarist accomplices of the counter-revolution", "left-wing chaotic" are the usual words used to describe us there. so: nothing good here either. much enemy, much honor! If people don't like anarchists in the east and west, then there must be a reason. So what is an anarchist really? Let's try a brief definition: an anarchist believes in a free society of equal people without domination. he advocates the elimination of all domination and therefore fights against the state. At the same time, he works on theoretical models and practical examples for a future society: a society without domination and authority, without exploitation and alienation ( I ). built on new principles such as solidarity instead of egoism, mutual help instead of competition, and free agreement instead of the principle of command. (2) "That all sounds very good," they will say, "but it's a nice pipe dream and can't be realized." They will laugh: Anarchists actually claim that such a society is possible, and explain to them why it can be possible. and now they will be amazed: there have actually already been half a dozen examples of anarchist communities. Did you know that Ukraine was anarchist for almost four years? Did you know that it was the anarchists who fought against fascism in the Spanish Civil War? Millions of Spanish workers practically showed that anarchism is possible! The anarchists are socialists and they are against domination. so they oppose domination in 'communism' just as sharply as in 'capitalism'. consequently, they incur the irreconcilable hatred of the ruling classes in the east and west. and just as logically, anarchism today is the only alternative to realizing a free and humane socialism. this is precisely why anarchism was resurrected after the war, although Trotsky, the Marshal of the red Army, had already ordered anarchism in 1920 to "go where you belong on the dung heap of history! " but through the ever more perfect machinery of oppression of the systems, through a social order in which the individual no longer means anything, in which technology no longer serves man but threatens to kill him, and in which the capitalist and communist economic systems fail to such an extent that 27,000 people have to starve to death every day (!) (le munde 1968), in short: in the "repressive chaos" (3) of all today's systems of rule, anarchism has acquired an undreamt-of topicality. 3) REPRESSIVE CHAOS means that the system oppresses people (repression), and is incapable of establishing human order. rather, this system brings about regular famines, wars and economic crises, as well as waste and unjust distribution of goods. this is what we call chaos, disorder. THE TERM OF "ANARCHY" AND ITS ORIGIN "Anarchy is not chaos but order without rule!" The word anarchy is as old as human civilization. it comes from the Greek word anarchia and means "no rule". it therefore means the absence of any authority. it is now a widespread prejudice that man cannot live without authority and government, as if a circus horse must perish without its trainer. For this reason, the word anarchy has also become a synonym (1) for chaos, disorder, wildness and destruction. in addition, there is the obvious intention to slander and combat anarchism as a political movement. For this reason, politicians and writers, communists and aristocrats, priests and housewives have for centuries spread this concept of anarchism. for them, the word anarchism is associated with a cold shiver and thoughts of the end of the world. like them, the majority of the population cannot imagine that an order - a free order - can exist without a state and rule. Even in general reference works, such as the Duden dictionary, anarchy is simply translated as "lawlessness". for the "normal consumer", this also implies that if anarchism is realized, society will be plunged into chaos, and in this respect this definition subliminally falsifies the term. in the actual sense of the word, the term "lawlessness" is of course correct: since laws are passed by the state and the state ensures that they are observed through the police and courts, if the state systems are abolished, the laws will also cease to exist. however, this does not mean that there will no longer be any rules or agreements in human coexistence. Pierre Joseph Proudhon was one of the fathers of modern anarchism. he adopted the word for the anti-authoritarian workers' movement. by anarchy, he understood absolutely the opposite of chaos. For him, anarchic society was the highest expression of order, an order that was not disturbed by domination and authoritarian structures. only in an anarchist society could the natural order of human relations, "social harmony", be restored. we will see that Proudhon was anything but a dreamy utopian. Thus Proudhon also considers the state as the highest expression of the rule of men over men to be the real troublemaker; a view that does not seem so far-fetched when one looks at all the wars, oppression and economic crises that have been and still are waged or instigated by the states and their organs. Because of its ambiguity, the name anarchism provoked much debate among anarchists, many of whom later called themselves "federalists" (supporters of a non-centralized polity based on equal communes), "mutualists" (social order based on the principle of mutual aid and solidarity) or "collectivists" (order based on communality). ) Towards the end of the 19th century, the word "libertarian" (liberal, not to be confused with liberal!) became increasingly popular. WHO IS AN ANARCHIST? As we have seen, the word anarchism outlines a liberal theory and attitude. Over time, a myriad of political and apolitical currents have gathered under this name. Thus, unlike Marxism, anarchism is not a unified entity. Marxism is a self-contained, philosophically thought-out theory; developed by a few people in a relatively short time, fairly clearly formulated and defined. anarchism is different. Its revolutionary political direction is the product of a whole series of important theorists, most of whom were also active revolutionaries. In many cases, its theory emerged from the practice of freedom struggles, and is and has been constantly reconsidered, criticized and improved. such an attitude is called undogmatic (dogma = unchanging dogma), and it is typical of anarchism. In the same way, one cannot name any leaders or chief theoreticians for anarchism: one has to name a whole series of names and cannot actually draw a line anywhere: the names of the well-known anarchists run somewhere in the range of active militants. (in this respect, one should not misunderstand if we have described certain people, their biographies and their ideas in some chapters. People like Bakunin, Kropotkin, Proudhon etc., right up to Landauer, should be mentioned as representatives of a particular movement to facilitate the historical description. It is not difficult to prove that there is a constant intellectual feedback between the individual theorists and the movement. Since anarchism consists of a myriad of political currents, it is clear that we can only describe a selection in the following -- that these (and also the scope devoted to the individual chapters) are characterized by their own views and ideas must of course be admitted) Parallel to the politically revolutionary line, which is the most important of anarchism, and which we prefer to speak of, there are a number of other currents that claim the name anarchism for themselves. These include certain forms of individual anarchism, some nature-worshipping sects of raw foodists, pacifist social reformers or apolitical gangs of terrorists, as well as pensive artist souls and belated romantics, mostly from the petty bourgeoisie. Their thoughts and actions are often at odds with the political direction of anarchism, and are criticized by it. other branches, however, have given anarchism new impulses and fruitfully supplemented its theory, such as anarchist art, free education theory, the hippie and underground movements, to name but a few. It has become commonplace. One example of this is the Red Army Faction (RAF), also known as the Baader-Meinhof Group. although the RAF distanced itself from anarchism and described itself as Marxist-Leninist, which the police were of course aware of, they were automatically labeled 'anarchist violent criminals'. the reason is obvious: firstly, the term anarchism can be used to defame an unpopular group in the public eye, especially as communism has become socially acceptable again as a result of the policy of détente, and secondly, we can see that anarchism is also gaining in importance again in Germany. Even if we have not condemned the actions of the RAF from the outset, their practice must be attacked from an anarchist point of view. over the years, the RAF has increasingly distanced itself from the entire left-wing movement and sees itself as an avant-garde, as an elite striving to impose "liberation" on the people according to the state-socialist model. in its pamphlets and actions, it has developed a dictatorial, Stalinist language. when they say: "the pig was shot in the name of the people", we ask ourselves: in whose people's name? On the other hand, of course, there are also quite a number of political groups that do not call themselves anarchist, but in reality act anarchist and have libertarian goals. often they reject the name anarchism because they are misinformed about it, or because they fear too much hostility. since it is not really about a creed, but about consistent political action, the anarchists have never asked for the name of their comrades in their practice and alliances. for example, there are many council communist groups that basically act more 'anarchist' than some groups that call themselves anarchist. We, too, want to base our consideration solely on what the individual groups do or did, and not on what they claim to be. WHAT DO THE ANARCHISTS WANT? Daniel Guerin writes in his book "Anarchism": "Anarchism is in reality and above all synonymous with socialism. the anarchist is first and foremost a socialist; his goals are the abolition of the exploitation of man by man. at the center of his political activity is the socialist idea of freedom, the abolition of the state." To achieve this goal, anarchists wage a struggle against the state and all its organs. this struggle is waged by various means: Through mass organizations (cf. anarcho-syndicalism), education and propaganda, direct action, through the creation of a counterculture, provocations and often also through the direct use of violence. however, the anarchist struggle is by no means blind iconoclasm against this or that government or the state per se. Rather, anarchist theorists recognized very early on that the state is not a phantom, not an anonymous entity, but the expression of very specific, primarily economically determined power relations. For this very reason, anarchists have always tried to wage a struggle against capital and the state and have refused to pursue "political" goals, such as the implementation of reforms through the gradual conquest of power in the state. because the anarchists were well aware that power corrupts: "Take the most radical revolutionary and put him on the throne of all the kingdoms, or give him dictatorial power, and before a year has passed he will have become worse than the tsar." Bakunin wrote. over time, the anarchists have put forward a series of demands and programmatic points, including Here are some of the most important ones, which we will try to explain in more detail in the following chapters: equal freedom for every person in society. no person should exercise power; all decisions are made and exercised collectively. this implies: - abolition of the capitalist mode of production, fight against capital and its international monopolies. Abolition of private ownership of the means of production (3). Construction of a federated, high-tech mode of production according to criteria that place the needs of the workers above those of profit-oriented production (cf. chapter 'economic system') - Overcoming strata and classes. the oppressed class must then use violence against the ruling class if the latter does not leave voluntarily (since the latter wants to defend its privileges and thus actively fights the construction of a free society) - Abolition of the state, its borders and its apparatus. Replacement by new structures based on equal communes and councils that organize themselves in a decentralized (federal) way. - Combat racism and colonialism in all its classical and new manifestations (e.g. imperialism, neo-imperialism, ewg-association, etc.) Abolition of churches and religions as mediators of the legitimacy of rule, by professional dumbed-down people. Combating and replacing religious faith with rational education, i.e. with the principle of reason and philanthropic science. Establishment of free schools (Tolstoy/Ferrer's concepts) Selman Kum and Tolstoy are religious anarchists. There is only one God and only he can judge me. Abolition of the army and the police as a power factor and symbol of the state and capital. For the phase of a struggle, they are to be replaced by revolutionary people's armies and patrols without a hierarchical structure. Abolition of the principle of punishment. Criminals are seen as products of a bad society, they are to be treated as sick and must recover, not be punished. Abolition of private ownership of human beings, consequently replacement of marriage and the bourgeois nuclear family by voluntary associations in extended families, communes, according to the principle of elective affinity. Propagation of free love. Combating the oppressive existing sexual morality Building a completely new, free culture with its own art, music, way of life, etc. Principle of criticism and self-criticism and permanent revolution in the new society. Rejection of all dogmas. constant review of the social structure according to the needs of society. Fight against every new form of domination, bureaucratism and militarism in the new society. This programme, incomplete and rather disorganized, summarizes the most essential points of anarchist objectives. at first glance, some theses may appear to be egalitarianism. in reality, however, their realization is only the prerequisite for all people to be able to develop freely according to their needs, become creative and develop their own personality. in the circles of the rich, it has become customary to present their own advantages, which they can buy with their money, as the freedoms of the people. in reality, however, the rich can only develop creatively and develop their own personality. in the circles of the rich, it has become customary to present their own advantages, which they can buy with their money, as the freedoms of the people. In fact, however, the rich can only be free to the extent that they rob the majority of the people. To summarize, we can say that the anarchists have only one goal: a free society. everything else is a means to achieve it. which can and must change depending on the situation. I should write: from Anarchy p.5 -14 copy footnote except footnote 3 - Repressive chaos TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW Through wild Kurdistan (Karl Mai 1881) With the Sykes-Picot Agreement of 1916, Great Britain and France, as the victorious powers of the First World War, divided the Ottoman Empire into colonial zones of interest and redrew the borders of the territories of Syria, Turkey, Iran, Iraq, Israel and Palestine. The Kurds were not taken into account when drawing these borders, and not by chance. They already knew they were going to do it. Although Karl Mai had already written about a Kurdistan some 35 years earlier, there was to be none after this colonial border demarcation. The Kurds live spread across the territories of Iraq, Iran, Turkey and Syria. Sabiha Gökcen was an Armenian adoptive daughter of Kemal Atatürk and a fighter pilot who bombed the Kurds in 1937. The Kemalists claim that Atatürk knew nothing about the bombing of Desrim, although his own daughter was one of the fighter pilots in the attacks. The decision to exterminate the people of Desrim, which was intended to set an example, was taken at a meeting of the Turkish Council of Ministers on May 4, 1937. Quote Kurdish Community Germany from the text: Desrim Massacre 1937-1938 The operation against the Kurds lasted two years and murdered tens of thousands and displaced tens of thousands more. My grandma was one of these displaced people, she met my grandpa through the expulsion. They married and had 12 children, 4 of whom died in infancy. My father was one of the 12 surviving children. He also left his homeland and came to Germany and this is where I was born and am writing this. I am the Mr. Worf of heavy metal. The Arabs don't listen to heavy metal. I heard on Al Jazeera the other day that the heavy metal band Rammstein is donating 5 million euros to Palestine. Correct guys! And they say the world is watching and nobody is stopping it, the singer of Rammstein said on Al Jazeera. The presenter asked him whether Rammstein also play in Arab countries? And the singer said no, Arabs wouldn't listen to Rammstein, except me! They also helped Haiti and Morocco and the Kurdish earthquake. TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW Democracy and dictatorship both subjugate the self. Anarchists read books, those who read books learn from experience. That is why people's reading is a danger to authority, to the powerful. The powerful also read themselves, they read the accumulated experiences of the powerful, such as Machiaveli's art of intrigue. What does Marius Müller-Westernhagen say? God You don't have to break the world, we'll do it ourselves, God. And it's Kellog's fault that we eat in the morning because he wanted to get rid of his product. People have to have revolutions and thoughts of overthrow in order to assert themselves. Revolutions are not dinners, you have to intoxicate and stun yourself for victory. The AFD, the Nazi party, welcomes the dollars, but not the people. What a contradiction. It's the same in America and that's fascism. Selman is not a dictator, he's a conciliare, an advisor. It's not an idea, it's a plan of how we overthrow the state. They see but they don't recognize because they're not made aware that they don't recognize. They can't get out of the trough of their views and that's why I call them the sleepers. The Greeks in Athens killed all the oligarchs and capitalists three thousand years ago. In the French Revolution of 1789 they also killed the rich and in the Russian Revolution of 1917 they did the same. All systems are similar, it is always about controlling and favoring the rich. TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW When people ate from the tree of knowledge, they got hate and envy and love. If everyone has a television and you don't, then you need a television too. Everyone should decide for themselves what is good and right, that's why you got the apple from the tree of knowledge. This is also how free will arises. There is a point at which consciousness can no longer recognize, this is called the blind spot and those who recognize it are the Illuminati and Selman's colleagues the Solicists. People are asleep when they are awake, our I is supposed to submit and deny and submit to the masters and be despondent and will-less. The human being should deny himself before the idea, his own being is then diminished in freedom. Among the Mongols and Huns, the first thought is the idea of freedom. I am the last Caucasian whose fear has been beaten out of him by his mother. I have conquered the stick. I act with logic, that's wrong, that's right. I live in the world of thought. I decide when I behave sensibly or not and only God is allowed to judge me. People have been living with a false consciousness for four thousand years, for four thousand years people have been seeing how far they can go with others and how much they can put up with. They can go as far as they like as long as no one puts up a fight. When people become aware of me, a transformation occurs and a change of consciousness takes place. My key thought is through love comes hate. But the truth is sacred, it is also indestructible and immovable. Many small selves make one big self with the same interests. They have to be in a club, then they will be right. Anarchists don't allow themselves to be ordered around if it doesn't benefit them, they don't follow a fixed idea, a dogma. Dogma does not mean deviating from the idea. But I deviate from the idea, the idea doesn't decide, I decide who I work with and not who is put in front of me. Putting something in front of me would be chaos. Those who are enthusiastic about the idea are obsessed with suppressing and even destroying people who deviate from the idea. That's why you have to organize against it in order to be able to stand up to it and be on an equal footing. Communists are incompetents and non-benefactors. Take the history of Ukraine, for example. There was anarchy in Ukraine from 1919 to 1923 and it went on for four years and worked quite well, and the Bolsheviks saw that and got scared that people would see that and want anarchism. So they used an intrigue against the anarchists. They let the Ukrainian anarchists fight against all other forces (Austria/Hungary, Belarus, etc.), supported them with weapons (as well as NATO today) until they were too weak to defend themselves and then attacked them themselves. The saying "Better to die upright than to live kneeling" was said by Emilio Zappata in 1913 and not by the evil uncles, who are thieves and Nazis and they stole the saying. Someone said to me the other day that I was a Nazi when I said it, because the bad uncles made it famous here and now people here know it as the bad uncles' saying and not as Emilio Zappata's saying. Some of them don't know Zappata at all, which is a shame. Corrupted power The advantage will remain, the disadvantage will disappear. Love creates hate. If you doubt, it's not right. Doubt is your compass in life. It's not something to smile away, it's something to get to know well. Recognize what you are doubting or keep driving into walls. You can't start to stop driving into walls until you start to doubt your actions. The spook wants to control you, but you are responsible for your actions, especially towards yourself. The spook won't bail you out afterwards and Hitler or some other madman won't rebuild your country after it's been destroyed. It is always an advantage to be able to recognize fairy tales, illusionists, fixed ideas and tricksters if you come across any of them. The truth is consolidated in the consciousness of man, it is immovable and indestructible. My themes fit together like a jigsaw puzzle, each sentence is a train of thought that has solidified in the mind. They begrudge the anarchists nothing. Now comes Selman who liberates the people. A philosopher of words who recognizes and describes patterns of behaviour through observation. Because people are asleep when they are awake. I am a guide. The machinations of capital. They destroy and build, we want a piece of the pie. Ronald Reagan (US President in the 1980s) said that if the rich get enough cake at the top, some of it always crumbles down to the poor. We are not satisfied with crumbs and, by the way, this is always promised and often even when something is taken away. Without hope there is no revolution. The hope is that at some point people won't always let themselves be screwed with the same rip-offs. Nitzsche (philosopher) has said that democracy has a dark and evil side. He observed Greek culture and recognized this and described the patterns of his observations. The majority is not taken seriously by the minority of capitalists. We have to be at eye level and organize ourselves, we workers and middle class. I am not for the party, but for the people and the peoples. TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW The floodgates are open to greed, the evil brokers make profits through commissions and bonuses and when everything goes wrong, the end consumer pays again. See the international financial and banking crisis in 2008, when end consumers had to buy the banks out. Capitalism knows no boundaries. The floodgates are open, there's no such thing where I live. With me, everyone gets 8 thousand and the machines work for the people, for everyone and not for one machine owner, everyone should own a machine. The loom was the machine that drove people into poverty at the beginning of the industrial revolution. If every family had owned such a machine loom back then, they would not have been impoverished. Or a machine association that belongs to the general public. And the machines have to last a hundred years. We drug dealers are the last free entrepreneurs, or rather pirates. Our cars are our ships. When we drive into cities, we make 60-80 thousand euros, without taxes. For me, tax means protection money. Under capitalism, I have to become a capitalist and I can only do that as a drug dealer. To be independent. But actually everyone has to have money. Communism is a must and society should be forced to work at the end. If the communists had relied on machines, they would have won against capitalism. The communists continued to exploit human labour because they thought they had enough workers, instead of thinking about their workers, they thought about the party. Justice comes when we organize ourselves because we are the masses. Syndicalism is a further development of trade union socialism, which was founded by the French anarchist Pierre Joseph Proudhon. Syndicalism propagated the appropriation of the means of production by the trade union. They then organize the administration instead of political representatives. Strikes, boycotts and sabotage were the means used by the syndicalists, while parliamentary efforts were rejected. I am a postmodern philosopher who questions and destroys all institutions and calls everything into question, and educates people so that they should not make mistakes. The basic idea is the idea of freedom first and foremost. I fight against injustice because I recognize it and have solutions ready. Now we come to the Nazis. Staufenberg was a general who wanted to kill Hitler. He failed and his colleagues were all brutally tortured. And then they went on trial and Hitler's lackey Roland Freisner was the judge in a show trial. Robert Freisner says to one of the putschists: "You're going to hell" and he says, "I'll go first, you come after." TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW At the beginning of their reign in 1933, the Nazis introduced sterilization terror into society with the "Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring". The bureaucratization of the breaking of taboos turned civil servants, nurses and doctors into accomplices, and this was maintained and expanded from year to year. The RKI, Robert Koch Institute is involved in the fascist experimental medicine of the Nazis with independent "research work". From the very beginning, the medical profession was disproportionately strongly represented in the National Socialist German Workers' Party, which one would not expect from a workers' party. TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW We should be afraid of the master of the idea, the state. Because it sees every citizen as a threat, the oppressive state uses intimidation as a ploy. If we do not listen, we are threatened by the state. The state develops anti-democratic traits, the delegitimization of the state comes from the state. It wants to control the citizens, thus turning the game around. It is written in our law that all power comes from the people. The state has turned the power around and turned with the economy against the customers and citizens, that is fascism and it is heading towards the abolition of consumer and labor protection, the erosion and dissolution of civil rights, towards forced customers and forced labor and war and we have all that at the moment. The fascist state is inciting its citizens against minorities and thus against itself. Because the minorities who are being bullied and whose rights are being taken away come from the citizenry of the state. Divide and rule. The state produces surrogate target victims to distract from itself as the perpetrator and thus entangles the rest of its citizens in guilt in order to associate itself with them. Like a sinister plot. TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW What do I mean by cake and crumbs? The capitalists get the big cake and the others are left with crumbs. But if there is no more cake for the capitalists, there are no more crumbs for the workers. In Germany, politicians are agitating against the unemployed and those who think differently. Speech and thought are banned. One percent takes the money and the others become poorer. The one percent own the media, newspapers, radio and television. Because the companies are linked to the state, they also control ARD and ZDF. This means they control the public conversation and thinking. The capitalists control the system and make 4000 billion a year in Germany and they blaspheme about the poor unemployed who only get 50 billion. You've gone all spiritual, why is that? Because the young learn the old tune and repeat it. That's politics. The egoist has nothing to do with the disintegration of his ego, he takes what he wants. The egoist refuses voluntary servitude. He does not deny his ego, he does not consent to his misfortune and does not chase after it. Man is born free. Etienne de la Boetie wrote in 1560: "The people beat themselves into shackles. They cut their throats, give up their freedom for a yoke, since it is entirely their choice to be a servant or free, they consent to their misfortune, and even more so they chase after it, and if all creatures that have sentiments feel as such the evil of subjugation and chase after freedom, as one sees in animals, which, although destined for the service of men, cannot become so accustomed to it, that the opposite impulse to freedom does not always shine through in the midst of the bondage by which the fall is, for man so degenerate, man who is born of nature to freedom, that is even the memory of his original state, and has lost the desire to enter into it again. " Ettienne wrote this almost 500 years ago and it is still just as true and still the freedom of man has not been achieved. Ettienne's grandfather was a slave, his father was a slave and today every civil right is in danger and under attack. People are being manipulated, incapacitated, made ill and trained all over the world. In my system, there are no fat people, no doofuses and no poor people, only smart, social and independent people. The family spirit diminishes my freedom. This is how the state diminishes my freedom. As a human being, I am a biotope. The spook and the being are opponents. The spook is the fixed ideas, i.e. the ideas you have adopted from outside that want to control your being. Your essence is your ego personality. We consist of 80% water and 20% carbon and breathe in gas. TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW Women in the Nazi era "Functional helpers" Women were also perpetrators of denunciations and murders in concentration camps during the Nazi era. Women could train as concentration camp guards in 14-day courses, voluntarily! In contrast to the cliché of the social competence and peacefulness of women, testimonies from the trials of women's concentration camps prove the cruelty of the Nazi perpetrators. As a result of the catastrophes of the 20th century, from the First to the Second World War, some German women were transformed from idealized droll little flowers into sadistic murderers of the defenceless. Ilse Koch, the wife of the Buchenwald camp commandant, went down in history as the witch of Buchenwald. Sadism led to perversion, which increased under such camp conditions to the point that Mrs. Koch, the commandant's wife, had lamps made with lampshades made from the tattooed human skin of the camp inmates. That's how perverted an Ilse could become in a few years. Well, it was a child of his world, which had already broken the identities of its citizens several times before, I mention this because identities were broken again on a grand scale between 2020 and 2024. The ruptures in identities and the resulting instability in personalities led to helpless monsters like Ilse Koch a hundred years ago. My mother would have been a good functional helper, she also ran after us with a stick for 6 years. I'm the last Caucasian, I beat the stick. You don't become evil you choose to do it, the women didn't have to do it, they applied for it. But people with weak and unstable personalities make weak decisions. The Nazis trained sheepdogs to bite into the gentials, they beat people to death in front of others who had to see it for humiliation and degradation, and a band played. No woman had to take part, anyone could have gone home. Ilse Koch, middle-class parents, Dresden, end of the First World War approx. 10 years old, liberal conservative grammar school, joined the NSDAP at the end of the 1920s out of conviction and interest, got to know new people, groupie. May 1937 Wedding with SS ceremonial. TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW German Society for Perinatal Medicine: late 80s early 90s Quotes: "Genetic counseling, prenatal diagnostics and eugenically indicated abortion are to be used to reduce the burden on the social budget caused by chronically costly patients." Source: Ludger Weß "Der Griff nach der Bevölkerung - Humangenetik und Bevölkerungspolitik" in: "Lebensrecht und Menschenwürde" Behindertenreferat der Stadt Essen 1990 "This also includes the latest attempts by the German Medical Association and medical lawyers to enshrine in law the possibility of sterilizing all incapacitated people as part of the planned reform of guardianship and care law" (DGSP Newsletter No. 38 September 1987) Those who read books go to those who don't read books and say it's time for a revolution. And then all the unlucky people die and everything starts all over again. Bertold Brecht is right, war is like a birth, there is always a new one. See Panchovilla 1912-1918 4 million dead in 6 years in Mexico. First comes the economic war, then comes the war. See China-USA, this is called sabre rattling and these are not our interests. Your generals who provide you with sob stories are not your friends. They are your exploiters and are working to destroy you, there is no reason to like them and kiss their asses. First and foremost I am an anarchist and I don't like people being screwed and cheated and I know that two and two are four and not otherwise. Experiences connect, even bad experiences connect. The perpetrators want to keep people's deception hidden from them, but I say that people have to recognize their deception in order to be able to free themselves. For me, the idea of freedom connects because it solidifies through training. You can't let your thinking be taken out of your hands. Play dumb and you'll find out more. Club of Lone Offenders is looking for bar staff for full mod nights in the summer. If I shoot you in the face I can't think it away. Even if I killed 10, I can't think it away. When you kill, you make decisions. You don't become evil, you choose evil. Functional helper National experimental German workers and doctors party Sketch: Tagesthemen für den Frieden / Frontline Tagesthemen / Tagesthemen von der Frontlinie TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW Play dumb and you'll find out more. Ask people questions you know the answers to and see who is lying to you and what kind of face they are making. The Club of Crazy Lone Offenders is looking for reinforcements for its bar staff during the full moon nights in August & September. Meaningful applications will probably go to the Auswertige Amt. If I shoot you in the face I can't think it away. Even if I killed 10, I can't think it away. When you kill, you make decisions. You don't become evil, you choose evil and death follows you all your life, everywhere. Even if you cut it out of your conscious mind, your subconscious knows you and makes you sick. It's psychosomatic, it's like a curse. I will remove the state's breeding ground. Deception and appearances are its nutrient. I enlighten and wake you up with coffee or coke. Deception and appearances set the framework for how people see reality, on television, on the radio, on the internet, at work and so on. By reporting on a topic, you only hear what is said, you don't hear what the speaker doesn't say, or leaves out, or forgets. It is as if you are standing on a photo in a picture. In the photo you have a frozen point of view, but if you were really standing in the picture, you could move your head and look to the side and see things that are not in the photo. Your generals who give you sob stories always leave important things out of the story that you're not supposed to know, or need to know, and then you think you're going to go out there, charge with your allies against the enemy, your generals have told you your enemy is weak. Then you find out your allies leave you alone, don't help you and your enemy isn't weak at all and you're cannon fodder and get used for some shit and don't know what's going on because your information was wrong. You've been manipulated. You have to push the envelope. I go back to the example of the woman who thinks she's free because she's working and doesn't realize she's a slave because she has to start over every month. The point of view is different, when she looks at things like this now, her gaze falls out of the frame and she recognizes the deception and appearance. I was in Ukraine, I warned them. I was there twice, before Selenski. In 2016, I was with Klitschko, I was with the press officer from the court building and I distributed 500 leaflets in the station district every day for 14 days. I paid for all that myself. I'm not a mercenary from some organization that tells me to do this. I do it on my own account. Well, I probably seemed strange to them too and it didn't take long before I was served a coffee with lots of cocaine. Thank God I'm experienced in drugs and you can't throw me off track too much with something like that anymore. I even enjoyed it. Cocaine is a matter of discipline, Paplo Escobar said, and I saved three hundred euros. I also suspect that they slipped the cocaine into my coffee because I was wearing a Pablo Escobar shirt. Anyway, I was whistled at at the police station for wearing a "Good & the Bad & the Ugly" shirt when I was there. - "This shirt is no good in Ukraine" because it's an anti-war movie. So in 2016, the press officer at the police station in Kiev was already fed up with anti-war symbolism. They didn't want to listen to me, they laughed at me and now they're stuck in a war that they're even clinging to and in which their whole country is being destroyed and redistributed. These criminals. I was like Jonah, I warned the city. In Bogota I was totally paranoid and scared, but less so in Ukraine. Bertold Brecht quote: "Anyone who doesn't understand the truth is stupid and if you understand the truth but don't tell it, you are a criminal." When the crisis comes, and it has been coming all along, everyone will lose their money, only those who have spent it will be the winners in the moment of crisis, in the system. If the billionaires don't spend their money, the money has no value. If you are good, you are a slave, if you listen, you are weak. Because you give up your will. And if you become bad, you cease to be good. Only the evil workers make revolution. Your soul burdens my soul. When I have killed someone, I can no longer think it away or repress it. God only likes weak people. When you kill, you are strong. Like Pinnochio, Pinnochio also had a conscience. Jimminy Cricket . You decide Pinocchio. Hate & obsession Hate means I hate everything and obsession means I kill, or punish, or humiliate. For the obsessed the idea is untouchable, because the obsessed submits to the idea, he throws himself away. The capitalists have promoted communism and fascism so that the workers do not realize that they are slaves. Logic gives me reason, reason is already inherently in people. Through reason, a person recognizes freedom. They must organize themselves and that means federalism. Federalism means uniting the masses, a general strike! Every sentence is a train of thought, in my book.One thought can change everything in your brain and in your consciousness. Autonomy means self-determination, autonomy and independence.Free will, as a rational being. making decisions independently without being influenced or determined by others. Self-legality. And by that I mean that only my balls give me commands. Heteromenia is heteronomy (dogma), submission. TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW Sergio Leone was an Italian director and screenwriting legend, his father was also a director and Mussolini said to him, make a movie for me and Sergio's father refused because he was a socialist and Mussolini was a fascist. As a result, Sergio's father was no longer allowed to work in film in Italy and as a child Sergio had to get bread for the family at the risk of his life.Sergio's father cried. Years later, he was in a snack bar in Paris with a producer from the film and the producer said: "How can you eat something like that?" And Sergio said: "You've never been hungry, so you don't know what it's like. "First Sergio was a socialist, then he became an anarchist. One of his favorite films was Death Melody over Mexico and Panchovilla. His anti-war film was War the Good the Bad and the Ugly, which was banned in America for two years because the USA felt denigrated in the film because they were not glorified in the film. War knows no rules was the message of the movie. Your will is your right. Mass makes violence and violence makes law. Syndicalism. Trade unionism. Then he shot it once in America and then he wanted to make a movie about Leningrad about the man-eaters who were surrounded by the Nazis and starved and the fields burned. Out of three million people, one was eaten. Sergio Leone could no longer shoot the movie because he had heart problems. TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW People are intimidated by the institutions if they do not dance to their tune. They should submit to the idea and not form associations. Then he's on the cart. With mass, we create violence and are on an equal footing. It's all about eye level and a balanced relationship. That man recognizes my counter-violence, mass makes violence and the union recognizes my violence.The opponent should recognize my violence.The goal is so close and yet so far. Alone I am weak, but when we are all together then we are strong. Define smart for me. Smart means clever, shrewd, cunning.Smart means seeing through the situation as it happens. I have the system figured out, we are all slaves because we have to start from scratch every month. So I'm smart because I see through it and I want to make people smart. Soylent Green is human flesh. Stupid is unteachable. My mother beat my brains out with a broomstick and an iron bar. She ran around the apartment after me like a fury. She showed me the world as it really is - cruel.And she always stank because she was always under stress and that went on for 6 years. We could either hide under the bed or the table.She was a sadist, she served us cold soup and we weren't allowed to go to the toilet.Nobody helped us, not family, not neighbors, not school, not youth welfare office either.They dropped us like a cold potato. But I beat the stick, they beat the fear out of me. That's what I call Caucasian parenting. The incapacitation of citizens. Making them helpless and defenseless.Keeping citizens in dependencies that they cannot control and playing them off against each other.Hate your neighbors.(Eve of Destruction). "You can bury your dead, but leave no trace, hate your neighbors" (Eve of Destruction - song) I will sue the city of Essen for 20 million euros for fraud and failure to provide assistance. A Colombian woman on TV said that democracy hasn't worked in Colombia for 70 years, not in the whole of South America. We need a new system." I agree with her. Neither democracy nor ballots, I am against both. Because both can give rise to a dictator. Just like Melonie in Italy, or Le Penn in France, Orban in Hungary. They all came to power through democracy and nobody wants to give it up because they are paranoid. We are in favor of a soviet republic. Even Putin and Thayip came to power through democracy. I have a plan B: all workers must organize and say boss get lost, the factory belongs to us and the world. The machines must work for the workers and all citizens must carry weapons to secure and protect it. The workers must organize worldwide. Equipment that lasts a hundred years must be distributed to the people, everyone should get 8,000 euros a month, whether they work or not. I saw two women on TV and they said: "Anyone who works nowadays is stupid. The workers live like in the Middle Ages." - So let machines work for everyone. I saw on TV how someone controls 2 thousand cows with a laptop. He fertilizes the fields with machines that he controls with a laptop. Information is communication and communication equals freedom.No boss likes smart workers who are smart and selfish and have their own interests. Loyalty is obsession.Faithfulness is loyalty. Hatred does not kill, obsession kills. Example: "I kill you because you don't like the god, or the party." Hate says "I hate killing, I hate torturing." You don't think like a criminal.If you thought like a criminal, you would understand him.But you don't understand him because you deny your ego.When you steal a Ferrari, you free yourself from self-denial.Those who behave selfishly get ahead. If the capitalists bet 2 thousand, they want to make 20 thousand profit. And in doing so, they drain the workers and the planet (resources). Everything fails because of money. The worker cannot realize his wishes because he has made himself dependent on wages and family history. When people read my book, they realize how television has screwed them over, deceived and cheated them.They don't know how things work. One train of thought can change everything, but these trains of thought don't make it onto television. What do I mean by that?Squeeze a lemon to the last drop.Example: The Chinese give electric cars 35 percent cheaper and the Americans and Europeans say this is market distortion, but if BMW and Mercedes also subsidize? but no, they have to squeeze the workers and coopers to the last drop. They don't begrudge the citizens the money, the poor citizen is the loser. I am the devil's bait. What does the devil want with one soul when he can have them all.Whoever plays with the devil burns his fingers.I want to make the city, the world bad and build pits for myself and they have built pits for me. The agents want to make me bad in my schizophrenia, so I say come and get me, I'm the bait. Build me pits and you'll fall in. What does Jesus say, whoever believes in me lives forever and they have all betrayed their master. The billionaires take the capital and natural resources from the poor and the secret services BND and CIA wage trade wars and enforce industrial interests.Like the United Fruit Company in South America, for example.Selman has a book on this, but don't look for it. We looked for the book and found it.Searched for 2 minutes, first shelf, bottom shelf, first pile.It's called "Banana War - CIA Putsch in Guatemala" Info One: United Fruit Company born in 1870.For comparison: Rheinisch-Westfälisches Kohlen Syndikat Essen born 1893. And today united Fruit Company is called Chiquita and the coal syndicate is called Evonik. In 1950, the Fruit Company was the employer of Edwart Bernays, the nephew of Sigmund Freud.Bernays also used psychology, but he was not a psychoanalyst, he did not help people to self-knowledge, he was more interested in influencing, manipulating and controlling the masses.He had previously made propaganda for Lucky Strike, when he seduced 68 percent of American women into smoking. At that time, women showed that they were modern and independent by smoking, because that was the image Bernay's advertising conveyed.This quote is from him: "The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element of democratic society.Those who manipulate this invisible mechanism of society form an invisible government, which is the true ruling power of our country.We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes are shaped, our ideas are proposed, largely by people we have never heard of. .. Regardless of one's attitude toward this state of affairs, the fact remains that in almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the realm of politics or economics, in our social behavior or in our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons - a small fraction of our one hundred and twenty million - who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. They pull the wires that control public consciousness, utilizing old social forces and inventing new ways to bind and lead the world." (Bernays "Propaganda" Chapter 1 1928) - So much like; "a ring to enslave them, to drive them all into darkness and bind them forever, in the land of Mordor where the shadows loom." ("The Lord of the Rings" J.R.R Tolkien) So he was a kind of Goebbels "of the good guys". Goebbels was the propaganda minister of the Nazis, i.e. Hitler. In Guatemala, he influenced a coup for the Fruit Company.So Bernays, not Goebbels.But both were anti-communists and anti-socialists. Sergio Leone's childhood, his father had turned Mussolini down (like Fritz Lang with Hitler) The Leones were punished and had to starve. Sergio stole bread (seven bodies) and his father cried. Functional assistant National experimental German workers and doctors party Sketch: Daily topics for peace / Frontline Daily Topics / Daily news from the front line TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW Competition is not good. Trump wants American capitalists to be allowed to exploit American workers and impose tariffs on products from abroad, that's like the mafia organization. Example: What does the mafia say? Why does the competition earn more? First comes the economic war, then comes the war. Pack fights, pack gets along. If I'm not tied down, I'm free. The capitalists have the advantage, they use the labor and the workers have the disadvantage. 200 families earn 600 billion a year, each of the 200 earns three and a half billion, they can't spend that. They've been doing that in Germany for 70 years. Instead of pointing the finger at welfare recipients, they should rather point the finger at the rich. The rich are to blame for everything, for the whole misery. They brought communism and fascism to the state because the proletariat has to start from scratch every month in this system too. In order to abolish competition, the workers have to organize themselves. I am a syndicalist. For example, the workers should stop work and sabotage and boycott and everyone should get 8 thousand and all workers have guns. General strike worldwide and we don't want war. The capitalists have power because they have dollars and can control everything with dollars. Everyone says competition stimulates business, so only the capitalists and the consumers have the profit and the workers the loss. The rich can fulfill their wishes, the workers can't, they can only dream and hope. In 5 years, nobody will have any more money because the capitalists will have everything and the workers will be the losers. Those who have spent their money will be the winners. Money is based on trust, not on gold. No child no animal knows what a border is, we are taught that. They are taught to be patriotic. Competition, the strong lie in wait for the weak and the weak for the strong, the struggle to assert oneself is unavoidable. The winner is the master and the loser is the subject. The capitalists have the law on their side. Respect the property of others. If the capitalist has the monopoly, he can sleep well. The competitor has sleepless nights because he then fears for his existence. As if the rich were to blame for poverty. Aren't the poor equally to blame for the wealth of the rich? Happiness and unhappiness depend on money. TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW I am the North Star, the guide by which people orient themselves in order to obtain the same rights. The I is in the foreground, with my thoughts the horizons open up. We must lose our fear of property and respect. Only shyness turns us into lumpenpack, ragamuffins, rabble-rousers and bums. The first basic idea is the idea of freedom. The Sultan has based his cause on nothing but himself. Ideas have placed themselves on nothing but themselves. And man submits to the idea and the masses play along with the game, whether they like it or not. So man is bound by invisible chains. Anyone who is a patriot betrays his egoism, his will should submit, should accept a foreign spirit. Possessed people do things that humans don't do. Hate does not kill obsession kills.They are close to each other.Example: obsession - you hate my family, or you hate my party.Most of the time the haters are obsessed with an idea.If I rip someone off for a hundred thousand euros, he wishes me dead and that's what everyone who gets ripped off wishes for.Or conscience says, "Don't kill him".God is conscience, his is revenge and Jesus was a good man.When Jesus was hanging on the cross, he said; for they know not what they do. - This is the ultimate powerlessness, to be murdered by the competition. The end justifies the means. Like Pepsi and Coke. My mother waited for us, when we got home she made us Caucasian with a broomstick. I beat the stick, my fear was beaten out of me. The ordeal went on for 6 years.I gained a different awareness.People have to accept the will of others in the state.People have to deny their own will.But in doing so, they also learn to cooperate and organize themselves, and cooperating is the opposite of competing.It is about organizing oneself sensibly and fairly.So I do not submit to another will if it is nonsensical and unjust, such an alien will is then not my will. TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW So fie on the egoist who thinks only of himself!If an egoist thinks to himself, "I'll break Selman's leg, then he can't sell his things on the market", then fie on him, because this is a crooked thought, it is soaked in the poison of competition.But we need egoists who are capable of community and just organization. All for all. There are also obsessive egotists whose whole life is based on making money, Scrooge McDuck from Walt Disney, those who work for the CIA. Hitler killed millions of people and was a Walt Disney fan.The CIA is also an organization of egotists, but they are ruthless and obsessed with the idea that they and their friends are worth more than others.They are arrogant and mean. They are selfish competitive terrorists and they obstruct their fellow human beings. Healthy egoists are in associations because they have the same interests, alone we are weak, together we are strong. The healthy egoists must organize against the unhealthy egoists. Against the CIA and against the fascists. If you want to have an advantage in society, you have to act selfishly. As an egoist, I have feelings, if someone makes me happy or sad, it plays with my feelings and that's why I choose others as my companions, my buddies, my buddies, my friends and colleagues. My feelings, like my thoughts, are my own and not alien to me. But in the friends I choose, I recognize myself and they recognize themselves in me. We are not just one, we are many and we are friends. The judge must judge independently, he is obliged to the law and the citizens and not to the rich.He must not judge mechanically and he must not act corruptly, he must judge according to his own will and not according to the ideas of others.For example, judging for the party, as with the Nazis.But that still exists today and more and more of it is happening all over the world at the moment. Those who deny their ego are pleasing to the state. We should strive for it but not reach for it.The carrot on a long stick, you want it and you can't reach it.If his crime succeeds, it serves him right; if it fails, it also serves him right. I should recognize and accept foreign law and submit to it. I and the state are opponents where peace cannot reign. If I win with anarchy, the state can no longer assert itself and dissolves into anarchy. The state and its will can no longer assert themselves and are null and void. Being human is also an idea.One should be inspired by the idea and absorb it and deny oneself, that is the purpose of the state.The sultan is an egoist, if you don't obey his laws and his will, you go to jail.His cause has nothing to do with others and everything to do with himself.Do you want to follow his example?Selfishness is the best way to get through life.That's what the Sultan says, but you have to tell yourself that.Away with any cause that is not entirely my own. You think my cause must at least be the good cause. What is good, what is evil, is me. I am my own thing and I am neither good nor evil. Neither makes sense to me. I don't just love people individually, I love everyone. But I love them with an awareness of selfishness.I love them because love makes me happy.I love because I like to love.I can love with my whole soul.I love and let the distorted embers of passion burn in my heart.Without taking the beloved for anything other than the nourishment of my passion, on which she is always refreshed anew.Love is the human aspect of man and the inhuman aspect is the loveless egoist.As if those who have no mouth and no voice could be mature.Crimes arise from fixed ideas.Ideas are foreign feelings that are imposed and instilled.He must humbly surrender his will. The egoist does not respect the idea and does not submit to the idea if there is no profit in it for him. The spirit is something other than me. But what is this other? An alien spirit that dwells within me and controls me and holds me captive and without will and leads me into a state that inhibits freedom. What religion calls the sinner, humanity calls the egoist. What about humanity, whose cause we are supposed to make our own?Is their cause someone else's?And does humanity serve a higher cause?No!Humanity only looks out for itself.Humanity only wants to promote humanity.Humanity is its own cause.In order for it to develop, it lets peoples and individuals toil in its service. And when they have achieved what humanity demands, they are thrown into the dustbin of history out of gratitude. The company says thank you and goodbye. Isn't the cause of humanity a purely selfish thing. If God is on my side, I have no fear. Look at the people being protected by devoted patriots. The patriots fall in bloody battles with hunger and hardship. What do the people ask for? The people become a prosperous people through the fertilizer of their corpses. The individuals have died for the great cause of the people. And the people send them a few words of thanks and profit from it. The company thanks them. That's what I call profitable egoism. Just like in Ukraine. Those who desert are selfish because they value their lives. The rich man has no worries, but the worker has worries. I chirp like a free bird, because I know that 2 and 2 are four and not 5. ...and now come the quotes: "What a person needs for life, he should not ask for it first, but he should take it." "Interest no longer holds marriages together, only love and friendship." "Believing is not knowing." The devil does not hate, he loves to torment, if he hated it he would not do it. Life is like a battle of assertion, the superior is superior and the inferior is inferior. I am an animal, a free bird chirping from the throat. People do not usually enter prison voluntarily and rarely stay there voluntarily.The egoistic desire for freedom arises. "The state's sole purpose is always to restrict and restrain the individual, to subtract him, to make him generally subservient." "You are not worth having what you allow to be taken from you out of weakness." - That's why we have to organize ourselves, mass makes violence and violence makes right. So what you can do is your power. Fear gives you a conscience, an invisible inhibition threshold. The ignorant begin to recognize their situation when they hear Selman the free bird. Without crime there is no state. The moral world, and that is the state, is full of cheats, liars and thieves.Society gets the revolution it deserves.You put the most upright revolutionary on a throne and he becomes the greatest tyrant. Advertise my book. Word of mouth, it's about all of us.Alone I am weak, together we are strong. Good luck. TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW Skeptical literature is mostly anarchist literature. Anarchists are there for the weak and powerless-and they are weak and powerless themselves-but they want to change that and fight against injustice. You become skeptical when something seems odd or strange; that's when you start thinking and questioning. When you become skeptical, you become an egoist. I begin to question things when I've had certain experiences, when I distrust the systems, or when I question the idea of whether one has prejudices. One looks behind the facade and recognizes things because one questions them. What does the goose say to the fox? "Fox, I know you." The goose is skeptical. You have to ask why. Why is it like that? And why not otherwise? Mikhail Bakunin was one of the greatest anarchists 200 years ago. He was a member of the Russian tsarist family-so, nobility. He questioned the nobility, became a rebel, and took part in every revolution in Europe-whether in Hungary, Austria, Germany, France, or Italy. He wrote books and traveled all over Europe. He co-authored the Communist Manifesto with Wilhelm Weitling, Friedrich Engels, and Karl Marx. There were four of them-not just Marx and Engels, as the communists want us to believe. Marx and Engels always mocked Bakunin and called him "the little fat one." In 1869, the Socialist International split-the communists and the anarchists parted ways. Because the anarchists said that the dictatorship of the proletariat (that is, the workers and the servants) would still be a dictatorship-and anarchists reject dictatorship and ballots alike. Even if the most righteous revolutionary sits on the throne, he becomes the worst tyrant. Power must be limited, and that's why everyone should keep their own. Bakunin was imprisoned in Russia. At first, they wanted to hang him. He spent 10 years in solitary confinement and 2 years in chains, and he attempted suicide twice. After 12 years, he was sent to a prison camp in Siberia, from which he managed to escape. He fled through Russia to Japan, then to America, then to England, and from there to Switzerland, where he wrote several books. TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW The true master knows when to step back On the Prohibition of Overwhelming in German Pedagogy and Beyond "It is not permitted to overwhelm the student-by any means-in the direction of desired opinions, thereby hindering the development of independent judgment. This is precisely the boundary between political education and indoctrination. Indoctrination, however, is incompatible with the teacher's role in a democratic society and with the universally accepted goal of student maturity." (Wehling, 1977) The prohibition against overwhelming was introduced in 1977 as a reaction to what the Nazis had done in education. Today, after COVID, it's old news, and the educators who refused to overwhelm their students are now unemployed. Today, teachers have once again become tamers, training children like animals. We anarchists have a more liberal attitude. Highlighting thought. How human consciousness works. How each of us evolves, what we strive for, achieve or fail at, what purpose we once pursued, and what dreams and desires currently live in our hearts. How our views have transformed, how our principles have been shaken-in short, how we have become something we were not years ago. We can recall this with more or less ease, and especially when observing the unfolding of another life, we feel quite vividly the changes within ourselves. This is how the human mind works. And in school, they try to make us weak and effeminate. Capitalism stops working at a certain point-when the money runs out. When the ruling lords and kings had no tax income, they started wars. And the corpses became the fertilizer for the future. The Pharisees saw Jesus as a competitor to their own mafia. That's why they planted Judas among his disciples to spy on the competition and Jesus said, "One of you will betray me." History is the history of a conspiracy. One might think Christians should be sympathetic to conspiracy theories. And besides: Jesus was an anarchist. And a good man. I explore consciousness like someone in a dark room feeling for the light switch. And once consciousness opens up, I move forward-and you will follow, once I've found the switch. Egoists, unite into associations. Burn your money and print new money. We are the masses. Don't fill my head with nonsense about what's impossible-exaggeration is only the beginning. War has nothing to do with humanity. It's either you or me-one of us must die. A Nazi is a sadist. Most Nazis are possessed-so possessed they kill and torture people to act out their obsessions. They tied prisoners to the whipping post, beat them to the bone, and then rubbed salt into their wounds. In school, they try to make us weak and submissive. We are supposed to submit and show no courage before the master-and then they try to train us with carrot and stick. They gave me bread and the stick too. They tried to break me-but I stood tall. If you're an egoist, never betray your I. I am like a flower. I don't want to stand in the shade-I want to soak up the sun, bloom, and then wither. And then, a new flower grows. To subjugate someone by force, to suppress them, to accept another's will under domination-and then to go on and do the same to others: to impose a foreign will, and then be controlled by it yourself. And if you don't accept these foreign thoughts, they'll stuff your mouth shut. I always ask people to tell me their stories. Most don't have much to say-most of their time is eaten up by work. Three weeks of vacation, and then that's it until 68. That's not a life-that's voluntary servitude. It's a monotonous existence. They accept it. They can't fight back. They give up. I cried out for help for six years-ages four to ten. Six years of beatings. No Nazi, no family, no youth welfare office helped us. Strange, isn't it? I have a saying: as you give, so shall you receive. I want to destroy the state through anarchy so the state cannot sustain itself. Its will and law are null and void. I can't respond to evil with evil. A public defender once said: "People who have done evil things are often good people-except for the moments when they became monsters." No one becomes evil out of thin air-it's a decision made in moments. I am a savior, a redeemer, a rescuer in times of need. That is who I am: Selman Kum, behavioral and social researcher, and philosopher of words. I have studied past forms of society-not only today, but in the past, future, and present. The outsider is the one with a will of his own. If you don't do what the state demands, it stuffs your mouth shut. Two dental assistants once said: "Mr. Kum, you're a good man." I said: "I'm dangerous." And the nurses replied: "No, Mr. Kum, you're not dangerous-you're kind and good." I am a planner. I plan to save humanity. I am Plan B-the last resort. Socrates was the first to say: "Your heart must be pure if your wisdom is to be respected." That's where the second phase of Greek spiritual liberation begins: the age of purity of heart. So Christ was the second. Socrates said it 350 years earlier. I conclude from this: If you kill someone, your heart is no longer pure. You can never forget the dead-they will haunt you. The Prophet Muhammad said: "Olemes (scholars) must not be killed." Someone asked him, "Why not foreign Olemes?" He said: If there are no Olemes, there is no light. Kill them, and you have no place in paradise. That's in the Qur'an. The Qur'an also says that everything written comes from God. I am a savior, redeemer, deliverer, bearer of hope, beacon of light, rescuer in the direst need. An enlightened one. That is me: Selman Kum. Nothing comes before me. The anarchist believes in a free society-without rule, oppression, or exploitation of humans by humans. Machines should work for us. Then the machines are the slaves-not the workers. Exaggeration is only the beginning. Be a realist, and you'll remain one. Burn your old money. Print new money. You are the masses-organize yourselves. My philosophy is a new consciousness. Downloading, uploading. That is Solizism-only through pure egoism can we win. Bring out the thoughts stored in your brain-those that control you, consciously or unconsciously. What does Jesus say? "You must believe in me firmly." That's why I don't kill anyone. What else did Jesus say? "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone." I, the Son of God, prefer not to throw stones. They say, "the competition never sleeps"-and the capitalists exploit the people. Fend for yourself. Interest-free loans in my system. You get a loan at 22, and again at 44. Three times in life, you can take out a big loan. The fat ones must reckon with their weight. The Nibelungen Saga The Nibelungen Saga is a heroic story from the 8th century. It tells how the Franks were warned by mermaids that they would all die if they went to war. They ignored the warning-and all perished. With Hitler, it was the same. He was sure of victory-even though he knew the Nibelungen Saga. And the Ukrainians didn't listen to me either-when I warned them in the Klitschko office. TO CHAPTER OVERVIEW My name is Selman Kum, I was born in Essen on 11.09.1969. Dear reader, in the second part of the book you can deal with the following topics:
|
Welcome to Solicism - The book (Part 1) - Me and my propertyEinleitung • Der Autor • Das Buch • Kitap • Download • Kontakt • Disclaimer • Datenschutz